Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

July 23, 2025, 08:44:03 pm

Author Topic: Methods & Further Vs Methods & Specialist Maths  (Read 14244 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

QuantumJG

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1748
  • Applied Mathematics Student at UoM
  • Respect: +82
Methods & Further Vs Methods & Specialist Maths
« on: November 20, 2010, 07:48:55 pm »
0
I really want to understand this trend. The trend where people are taking further & methods over methods & specialist Maths.

By doing 2 Maths subjects you already show yourself to have an aptitude with Maths and by doing specialist Maths your career prospects increase. Specialist Maths is recommended if you want to become an:

- Engineer
- Actuary
- Economist
- mathematician (obviously)
- Physicist

etc.

The point is that if you want to do a job requiring high level Maths then you should do specialist Maths.


2008: Finished VCE

2009 - 2011: Bachelor of Science (Mathematical Physics)

2012 - 2014: Master of Science (Applied Mathematics/Mathematical Physics)

2016 - 2018: Master of Engineering (Civil)

Semester 1:[/b] Engineering Mechanics, Fluid Mechanics, Engineering Risk Analysis, Sustainable Infrastructure Engineering

Semester 2:[/b] Earth Processes for Engineering, Engineering Materials, Structural Theory and Design, Systems Modelling and Design

pi

  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 14348
  • Doctor.
  • Respect: +2376
Re: Methods & Further Vs Methods & Specialist Maths
« Reply #1 on: November 20, 2010, 07:53:01 pm »
0
one word: 'lazy'


I personally know people who have decided to take Further after doing GMA, I think it is because they believe it is a free 50 (which we all know it definitely isn't) and it involves much less work (not sure about the validity of this point). Those are main reasons I have found in my school anyway.

+Not everyone wants a job requiring high level maths (eg. med, law, commerce, teaching, etc.)

iNerd

  • Guest
Re: Methods & Further Vs Methods & Specialist Maths
« Reply #2 on: November 20, 2010, 07:54:22 pm »
0
Am I the only kid who thinks Further is hard?
All that statistics and shiz just doesn't sit right on me.
Also I'd die with modules such as networks and matrices...more a trig/graphs guy :P
The point is...Spesh seems like a safer option in terms of SS and alongisde the benefits the OP has listed, why wouldn't you pursue it?

pi

  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 14348
  • Doctor.
  • Respect: +2376
Re: Methods & Further Vs Methods & Specialist Maths
« Reply #3 on: November 20, 2010, 07:56:51 pm »
0
Am I the only kid who thinks Further is hard?
All that statistics and shiz just doesn't sit right on me.
Also I'd die with modules such as networks and matrices...more a trig/graphs guy :P
The point is...Spesh seems like a safer option in terms of SS and alongisde the benefits the OP has listed, why wouldn't you pursue it?

Answer: see my post, 'lazy'

+some people love stats and stuff, and after GMA, realise trig proofs and vectors isn't exactly what they like

eeps

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Superstar
  • ******
  • Posts: 2532
  • Respect: +343
Re: Methods & Further Vs Methods & Specialist Maths
« Reply #4 on: November 20, 2010, 08:06:12 pm »
0
I personally know people who have decided to take Further after doing GMA, I think it is because they believe it is a free 50 (which we all know it definitely isn't) and it involves much less work (not sure about the validity of this point). Those are main reasons I have found in my school anyway.

That's true at my school as well. About 80% of students doing GMA this year are a) dropping it altogether OR b) dropping GMA and taking up Further. Also at my school, the Methods 3/4 students (in Year 11) beat basically all other students in the year level in GMA, considering they have done some of the concepts before - which deters other students from continuing into Specialist Maths.

Most students at my school consider it an easy subject - which isn't the case. As with any subject, you have to work hard to get a good score - it's not as if, doing Further will guarantee a high score. IMO I think it would be more rewarding to do Specialist Maths, then it would be doing Further.
« Last Edit: November 20, 2010, 08:08:18 pm by EPL.11.4ever. »

luken93

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3060
  • Respect: +114
Re: Methods & Further Vs Methods & Specialist Maths
« Reply #5 on: November 20, 2010, 08:11:30 pm »
0
I believe that for some reason, people think that Further is relatively easy to get 45, as opposed to to getting an equivalent of ~38 for Spesh.
However, although I can't comment on Further's difficulty, kids can think that they can just cruise through further and get 45+ with little to no work, however most don't know that you can only really drop about 5 marks to get this score, but they don't realise this until it's too late!
2010: Business Management [47]
2011: English [44]   |   Chemistry [45]  |   Methods [44]   |   Specialist [42]   |   MUEP Chemistry [5.0]   |   ATAR: 99.60
UMAT: 69 | 56 | 82 | = [69 / 98th Percentile]
2012: MBBS I @ Monash

iamtom

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 451
  • Indubitably dubious
  • Respect: +35
  • School: Melbourne High School
  • School Grad Year: 2011
Re: Methods & Further Vs Methods & Specialist Maths
« Reply #6 on: February 12, 2011, 10:40:07 am »
0
Am I the only kid who thinks Further is hard?
All that statistics and shiz just doesn't sit right on me.
Also I'd die with modules such as networks and matrices...more a trig/graphs guy :P
The point is...Spesh seems like a safer option in terms of SS and alongisde the benefits the OP has listed, why wouldn't you pursue it?

You're going to love probability.
2013: Wizardry, life.

ech_93

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 290
  • Respect: +6
Re: Methods & Further Vs Methods & Specialist Maths
« Reply #7 on: February 12, 2011, 11:48:39 am »
0
My school doesn't even offer spesh, coz not enough people choose it.
ATAR aim: 90+
2012- ???

Darren

  • Guest
Re: Methods & Further Vs Methods & Specialist Maths
« Reply #8 on: February 12, 2011, 11:53:19 am »
0
You can't really call people who do further lazy. Some people don't even need specialist or methods... why must people associate 'laziness' with a subject?  People have varying dreams, sorry but not everyone wants to be an engineer.

ech_93

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 290
  • Respect: +6
Re: Methods & Further Vs Methods & Specialist Maths
« Reply #9 on: February 12, 2011, 12:05:51 pm »
0
I don't think he was saying that EVERYONE who does further is lazy...
ATAR aim: 90+
2012- ???

Truck

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 870
  • Respect: +122
  • School: who needs school when you got SWAG?
Re: Methods & Further Vs Methods & Specialist Maths
« Reply #10 on: March 02, 2011, 02:51:35 pm »
0
After 1 month of GMA, I must say further looks appealing right now. This is more because my teacher is this freak of maths Russian guy who sets work MUCH harder than the textbook standard or any other teacher, with a class avg. of like below 50% on his first test. That's just personal experience though :P.
#yolo #thuglife #swaggotandproud

Inspirations: Mahtama Ghandi, T-Pain, The Caped Crusader and Ayn Rand.

pi

  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 14348
  • Doctor.
  • Respect: +2376
Re: Methods & Further Vs Methods & Specialist Maths
« Reply #11 on: March 02, 2011, 03:52:26 pm »
0
After 1 month of GMA, I must say further looks appealing right now. This is more because my teacher is this freak of maths Russian guy who sets work MUCH harder than the textbook standard or any other teacher, with a class avg. of like below 50% on his first test. That's just personal experience though :P.

Yarrussky is awesome... Better than Dr G. in my opinion. Had him in year 10 and now in yr12 spesh. His tests are great prep for exams, don't lose confidence with your scores (if they are poor). Wish I had him for GMA too :(

Truck

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 870
  • Respect: +122
  • School: who needs school when you got SWAG?
Re: Methods & Further Vs Methods & Specialist Maths
« Reply #12 on: March 02, 2011, 08:04:15 pm »
0
After 1 month of GMA, I must say further looks appealing right now. This is more because my teacher is this freak of maths Russian guy who sets work MUCH harder than the textbook standard or any other teacher, with a class avg. of like below 50% on his first test. That's just personal experience though :P.

Yarrussky is awesome... Better than Dr G. in my opinion. Had him in year 10 and now in yr12 spesh. His tests are great prep for exams, don't lose confidence with your scores (if they are poor). Wish I had him for GMA too :(

Heh, I got Dr G for Methods as well :P.

I'ma see my results on the Unit 1 exam and just base my decision to drop or not on that.
#yolo #thuglife #swaggotandproud

Inspirations: Mahtama Ghandi, T-Pain, The Caped Crusader and Ayn Rand.

FatnessFirst

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 235
  • Respect: +2
Re: Methods & Further Vs Methods & Specialist Maths
« Reply #13 on: March 02, 2011, 08:12:10 pm »
0
one word: 'lazy'


I personally know people who have decided to take Further after doing GMA, I think it is because they believe it is a free 50 (which we all know it definitely isn't) and it involves much less work (not sure about the validity of this point). Those are main reasons I have found in my school anyway.

+Not everyone wants a job requiring high level maths (eg. med, law, commerce, teaching, etc.)

This. Specialist is "doable" but the amount of work that you have to put in it is not worth it when you can do spesh at uni.  Also, it's pretty fun going back to year 9/10 Maths.

Readinya

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 266
  • Respect: +6
Re: Methods & Further Vs Methods & Specialist Maths
« Reply #14 on: March 02, 2011, 11:41:37 pm »
0

This. Specialist is "doable" but the amount of work that you have to put in it is not worth it when you can do spesh at uni.  Also, it's pretty fun going back to year 9/10 Maths.

That may be true, but VCE Spesh at uni is covered in 3/4 of one semester... around 8-12 weeks.

one word: 'lazy'


I personally know people who have decided to take Further after doing GMA, I think it is because they believe it is a free 50 (which we all know it definitely isn't) and it involves much less work (not sure about the validity of this point). Those are main reasons I have found in my school anyway.

+Not everyone wants a job requiring high level maths (eg. med, law, commerce, teaching, etc.)

True. But i'm just a person who understood those concepts pretty easily; i really didn't do much work in class for Further. However, my friends struggled with some of the concepts, and looked to me to help them, even though i haven't done most of the work.


I must admit though, the amount of Spesh work i've done so far is nearly as much as what i've done for Further all last year; but i find it a heck lot more rewarding.
2010 - Further Maths; Literature
2011 - Specialist Maths; Mathematical Methods CAS; Japanese Second Language; Chemistry; Biology
2012 - Science/Law @Monash Clayton