Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

July 21, 2025, 02:30:49 pm

Author Topic: Molecular shapes  (Read 4014 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

nacho

  • The Thought Police
  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Superstar
  • ******
  • Posts: 2602
  • Respect: +418
Molecular shapes
« on: January 03, 2011, 09:04:14 pm »
0
Hi,
so i was going over molecular shapes and stuff, just when I thought i had it nailed,
i came across CS2.
From what i've seen previously, molecules with more than 2 atoms, in which there are several atoms attached to just one (eg. H2S)
The molecular shape is always tetrahedral (including the bonding pairs and lone pairs, otherwise, it is: 5 atoms - tetrahedral, 4 atoms, triangular pyramid, 3 atoms bent or v-shaped, 2 atoms - linear [please correct me if i'm mistaken])..
So I drew the molecular shapes for 4 molecules: H2S, HI, CCl4 and PH3 - all of which, were correct.
I then came across CS2, which of course, has a double bond - this is what differed this molecule from the others.
What struck me as odd, was that there were 3 atoms in this molecule, yet it maintained that Linear shape,
and now thinking about it, I've come to the realisation that i overlooked the fact that the lone pair electrons help determine the shape (once again, correct if i'm wrong)
So does CS2 have a Linear shape, due to the fact that CS2 has no lone pair electrons?
If a certain molecule had double bonds as well as lone pair electrons, would it still follow the thing i stated before ?(in green)
Is there anything different about molecules with triple bonds?
Please guide me.

Edit: I would like to rephrase what I said in the green and before, so that it is clearer.
As long as there are 4 pairs of electrons, the general shape of the molecule, including lone pairs, is tetrahedral, EXCEPT for a molecule with only 2 atoms, where the shape is tetrahedral, but arranged horizontally rather than vertically.
That is all.


Edit again: This is what my book has to say for CO2(which is essentially the same as CS2):
In a carbon dioxide molecule, the four electron pairs around the central carbon atom are concentrated in two regions of negative charge only, each one consisting of a double bond. These two regions repel and so assume positions as far from one another as possible on opposite sides of the central carbon.
The two oxygen atoms and the carbon lie in a straight line and so the molecule has a linear shape.

This sort of clears things(anyone have to add, rephrase anything?) however, in the bold - is this a statement or conclusion?

Thanks.
« Last Edit: January 03, 2011, 09:20:53 pm by nacho »
OFFICIAL FORUM RULE #1:
TrueTears is my role model so find your own

2012: BCom/BSc @ Monash
[Majors: Finance, Actuarial Studies, Mathematical Statistics]
[Minors: Psychology/ Statistics]

"Baby, it's only micro when it's soft".
-Bill Gates

Upvote me

luken93

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3060
  • Respect: +114
Re: Molecular shapes
« Reply #1 on: January 03, 2011, 09:36:48 pm »
0
In the end all molecules' atoms/electrons are spread in such a way that they are as far apart from each other.

Have a look at the attached electron dot diagrams of H2O and CO2, and see if you pick up anything...
2010: Business Management [47]
2011: English [44]   |   Chemistry [45]  |   Methods [44]   |   Specialist [42]   |   MUEP Chemistry [5.0]   |   ATAR: 99.60
UMAT: 69 | 56 | 82 | = [69 / 98th Percentile]
2012: MBBS I @ Monash

nacho

  • The Thought Police
  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Superstar
  • ******
  • Posts: 2602
  • Respect: +418
Re: Molecular shapes
« Reply #2 on: January 03, 2011, 09:44:23 pm »
0
In the end all molecules' atoms/electrons are spread in such a way that they are as far apart from each other.

Have a look at the attached electron dot diagrams of H2O and CO2, and see if you pick up anything...
True enough, I see how this works now, thanks,
however, i still seem to be getting some of them wrong(i think) I'll post them up in a sec
« Last Edit: January 03, 2011, 09:47:09 pm by nacho »
OFFICIAL FORUM RULE #1:
TrueTears is my role model so find your own

2012: BCom/BSc @ Monash
[Majors: Finance, Actuarial Studies, Mathematical Statistics]
[Minors: Psychology/ Statistics]

"Baby, it's only micro when it's soft".
-Bill Gates

Upvote me

luken93

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3060
  • Respect: +114
Re: Molecular shapes
« Reply #3 on: January 03, 2011, 09:53:19 pm »
0
In the end all molecules' atoms/electrons are spread in such a way that they are as far apart from each other.

Have a look at the attached electron dot diagrams of H2O and CO2, and see if you pick up anything...
True enough, I see how this works now, thanks,
however, i still seem to be getting some of them wrong(i think) I'll post them up in a sec
no worries, it takes a while to work them out properly.

I'll try and find the link to the website I used to learn it..
« Last Edit: January 03, 2011, 09:58:10 pm by luken93 »
2010: Business Management [47]
2011: English [44]   |   Chemistry [45]  |   Methods [44]   |   Specialist [42]   |   MUEP Chemistry [5.0]   |   ATAR: 99.60
UMAT: 69 | 56 | 82 | = [69 / 98th Percentile]
2012: MBBS I @ Monash

luken93

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3060
  • Respect: +114
Re: Molecular shapes
« Reply #4 on: January 03, 2011, 10:00:53 pm »
0
2010: Business Management [47]
2011: English [44]   |   Chemistry [45]  |   Methods [44]   |   Specialist [42]   |   MUEP Chemistry [5.0]   |   ATAR: 99.60
UMAT: 69 | 56 | 82 | = [69 / 98th Percentile]
2012: MBBS I @ Monash

nacho

  • The Thought Police
  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Superstar
  • ******
  • Posts: 2602
  • Respect: +418
Re: Molecular shapes
« Reply #5 on: January 03, 2011, 10:15:54 pm »
0
Sorry it took so long to reply,
attached is two attempts of drawing..
Also, thats an awesome site!
Looks butt-ugly though.
« Last Edit: January 03, 2011, 11:11:32 pm by nacho »
OFFICIAL FORUM RULE #1:
TrueTears is my role model so find your own

2012: BCom/BSc @ Monash
[Majors: Finance, Actuarial Studies, Mathematical Statistics]
[Minors: Psychology/ Statistics]

"Baby, it's only micro when it's soft".
-Bill Gates

Upvote me

Mao

  • CH41RMN
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 9181
  • Respect: +390
  • School: Kambrya College
  • School Grad Year: 2008
Re: Molecular shapes
« Reply #6 on: January 03, 2011, 10:16:24 pm »
0
Each atom has some electrons in the outer shell (valence). some participate in bonding, some become lone pairs. Each lone pair and bonding region (double bond is one region, single bond is also one region) occupies space and like to be far away from other regions. The regions thus form configurations furthest away from each other: 1-linear, 2-linear, 3-trigonal, 4-tetrahedral. these are the parent geometry or central geometry.

However, the actual geometry is different, as lone pairs don't occupy space. H2O for example has 4 regions (2 single OH bonds, two line pairs on O), its parent geometry is tetrahedral, but since two regions are invisible (lone pairs are invisible), it appears bent. HF has 4 regions (single bond, 3 lone pairs), parent geometry is tetrahedral, apparent geometry is linear. CO2 has two regions (2 double bonds), parent geometry is linear, apparent geometry is linear.

the name of this theory is called VSEPER theory.

Try CH3Cl, NH3, CH2O, BH3, FH, H-O-O-H (hydrogen peroxide, H2O2), N2H2 (H-N=N-H), S8 (crown sulfur), HCOOH (formic acid), CS2/CO2
Editor for ATARNotes Chemistry study guides.

VCE 2008 | Monash BSc (Chem., Appl. Math.) 2009-2011 | UoM BScHon (Chem.) 2012 | UoM PhD (Chem.) 2013-2015

luken93

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3060
  • Respect: +114
Re: Molecular shapes
« Reply #7 on: January 03, 2011, 11:15:31 pm »
0
Haha I know the website looks pretty bad, but the animations are very helpful compared to the fixed textbook pics :)
2010: Business Management [47]
2011: English [44]   |   Chemistry [45]  |   Methods [44]   |   Specialist [42]   |   MUEP Chemistry [5.0]   |   ATAR: 99.60
UMAT: 69 | 56 | 82 | = [69 / 98th Percentile]
2012: MBBS I @ Monash

nacho

  • The Thought Police
  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Superstar
  • ******
  • Posts: 2602
  • Respect: +418
Re: Molecular shapes
« Reply #8 on: January 03, 2011, 11:17:30 pm »
0
Haha I know the website looks pretty bad, but the animations are very helpful compared to the fixed textbook pics :)
very true, the animations are hideously awesome.
could anyone help me in identifying my errors in the one I drew  ?
« Last Edit: January 04, 2011, 01:45:34 pm by nacho »
OFFICIAL FORUM RULE #1:
TrueTears is my role model so find your own

2012: BCom/BSc @ Monash
[Majors: Finance, Actuarial Studies, Mathematical Statistics]
[Minors: Psychology/ Statistics]

"Baby, it's only micro when it's soft".
-Bill Gates

Upvote me

Russ

  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 8442
  • Respect: +661
Re: Molecular shapes
« Reply #9 on: January 04, 2011, 01:16:50 pm »
0
Haha I know the website looks pretty bad

Haha this is what my class said (our teacher was one of the guys who developed it)

nacho

  • The Thought Police
  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Superstar
  • ******
  • Posts: 2602
  • Respect: +418
Re: Molecular shapes
« Reply #10 on: January 04, 2011, 04:54:58 pm »
0
^

hideously awesome.

Haha is this oxymoron meant to be sarcasm then?
Na, those diagrams are extremely hideous and hurt my eyes, but they are definitely helpful
was my attempt of drawing the molecule wrong though? The book didn't seem to include the lone pair electrons for the oxygen?
« Last Edit: February 06, 2011, 06:37:32 pm by nacho »
OFFICIAL FORUM RULE #1:
TrueTears is my role model so find your own

2012: BCom/BSc @ Monash
[Majors: Finance, Actuarial Studies, Mathematical Statistics]
[Minors: Psychology/ Statistics]

"Baby, it's only micro when it's soft".
-Bill Gates

Upvote me

nacho

  • The Thought Police
  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Superstar
  • ******
  • Posts: 2602
  • Respect: +418
Re: Molecular shapes
« Reply #11 on: January 04, 2011, 05:35:37 pm »
0
I'm a little lost as to why the bonding pair is ommitted, but your shape does seem wrong. Technically speaking, the O atoms are supposed to 'repel' each other as far as possible (resulting in that out-spread shape => linear/planar) - dipole-dipole forces ;)
yea i just went over that, so fair enough
what about the one underneath? still so confused as to how you are supposed to know the correct order left to right (are you?)
« Last Edit: January 04, 2011, 05:37:24 pm by nacho »
OFFICIAL FORUM RULE #1:
TrueTears is my role model so find your own

2012: BCom/BSc @ Monash
[Majors: Finance, Actuarial Studies, Mathematical Statistics]
[Minors: Psychology/ Statistics]

"Baby, it's only micro when it's soft".
-Bill Gates

Upvote me

AskQuestions

  • Guest
Re: Molecular shapes
« Reply #12 on: January 05, 2011, 03:50:12 pm »
0
Sorry it took so long to reply,
attached is two attempts of drawing..
Also, thats an awesome site!
Looks butt-ugly though.

Wait, how would you even know in the first place whether there is a double bond or not?
Like in HCO2, how would you know there is a double bond between the C and the O rather than there being an extra lone pair?

vexx

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3965
  • Respect: +66
Re: Molecular shapes
« Reply #13 on: January 05, 2011, 04:30:47 pm »
0
H-C=O

Oxygen has 6 electrons in its outer shell, and it needs to make an octet. If C-O was a single bond, then it would not make the octet, rather then if it makes a double bond an octet is formed for both carbon and oxygen.
2010 VCE: psychology | english language | methods cas | further | chemistry | physical ed | uni chemistry || ATAR: 97.40 ||

2011: BSc @ UoM

Y1: biology of cells&organisms | music psychology | biological psychology | secret life of language | creative writing
    || genetics&the evolution of life | biochemistry&molecular biology | techniques of molecular science -.- | mind,brain&behaviour 2

20XX: MEDICINE