Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

September 21, 2025, 10:15:37 pm

Author Topic: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?  (Read 51709 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

psychlaw

  • Guest
Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
« Reply #150 on: June 12, 2008, 05:12:20 pm »
I said:
Over 50% Delta Waves
Night Terrors may occur


I'm unsure if the no rapid eye movement characteristic will count because its also a characteristic for every other NREM stage...

jess3254

  • Guest
Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
« Reply #151 on: June 12, 2008, 05:12:57 pm »
for 2 characterisits of stage 4 sleep.... r these correct answers?
lowest physiological responses in any stage of sleep
no rapid eye movement


Yeah, that's pretty much what I wrote. Stage 4 is characterised by:
-Limited eye movement
-Any physiological response is low. (something like that)
(and generally delta-waves)

As for the exam, I was extremely happy! :) Didn't find it too difficult. A nice contrast to yesterday's exam! Our class had an end of unit 3 party after the exam ;D it was fun.
« Last Edit: June 12, 2008, 05:17:35 pm by jess3254 »

jess

  • Victorian
  • Fresh Poster
  • *
  • Posts: 2
Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
« Reply #152 on: June 12, 2008, 05:13:34 pm »
in the 2005 exam i think... there was like 4 MC that had more then one correct answer

maybe it will be the same with this

jess3254

  • Guest
Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
« Reply #153 on: June 12, 2008, 05:15:38 pm »
in the 2005 exam i think... there was like 4 MC that had more then one correct answer

maybe it will be the same with this

You have an awesome name! :P

mskwmskw

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 55
Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
« Reply #154 on: June 12, 2008, 05:16:50 pm »
a short answer in visual perception....
height in the visual field..... markets n stalls
what did people write for that one?
ENTER: 80 plus please
ECO 38+
HHD 38+
PSYCH 38+
ENGLISH 32
FURTHER 33
RE 31

KeyMan

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 58
Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
« Reply #155 on: June 12, 2008, 05:23:20 pm »
I wrote:

Relative size = "The painter could paint two adults in the painting, having one bigger than the other. We would expect both adults to be roughly the same size but the one that casts a larger image on the retina will be perceived as being closer than the one that casts a smaller image on the retina"

Height in the visual field = "The painter could paint one stall closer to the horizon and one further. The stall closer to the horizon will be perceived as being further away and the stall further away from the horizon will be perceived as closer"

I hate short answers, I know the answer but I can never word it correctly.
« Last Edit: June 12, 2008, 05:25:52 pm by KeyMan »

psychlaw

  • Guest
Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
« Reply #156 on: June 12, 2008, 05:27:53 pm »
I wrote for Relative Size: The market shops and the shoppers near the front of the image would produce a larger retinal image then those who are further away (who would produce a smaller retinal image)

For Height in the Visual Field: The market shops and the shoppers who are the most distant would be painted closer to the horizon, and the ones who are the least distant are closer towards the front of the image

moshi

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 282
Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
« Reply #157 on: June 12, 2008, 05:29:08 pm »
I wrote:

Relative size = "The painter could paint two adults in the painting, having one bigger than the other. We would expect both adults to be roughly the same size but the one that casts a larger image on the retina will be perceived as being closer than the one that casts a smaller image on the retina"

Height in the visual field = "The painter could paint one stall closer to the horizon and one further. The stall closer to the horizon will be perceived as being further away and the stall further away from the horizon will be perceived as closer"

I hate short answers, I know the answer but I can never word it correctly.

what i wrote was really similar to yours...although i'm not sure how clearly i expressed myself :S

sonnypls

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 202
Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
« Reply #158 on: June 12, 2008, 05:31:07 pm »
for 2 characterisits of stage 4 sleep.... r these correct answers?
lowest physiological responses in any stage of sleep
no rapid eye movement


Yeah, that's pretty much what I wrote. Stage 4 is characterised by:
-Limited eye movement
-Any physiological response is low. (something like that)
(and generally delta-waves)

As for the exam, I was extremely happy! :) Didn't find it too difficult. A nice contrast to yesterday's exam! Our class had an end of unit 3 party after the exam ;D it was fun.

where was my invite? I do unit 3 too :(

moshi

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 282
Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
« Reply #159 on: June 12, 2008, 05:39:50 pm »
you did unit 3. it's over!!

sonnypls

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 202
Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
« Reply #160 on: June 12, 2008, 05:44:26 pm »
hate life.

jonny

  • Victorian
  • Fresh Poster
  • *
  • Posts: 2
Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
« Reply #161 on: June 12, 2008, 05:48:01 pm »
The Sykoloji was really easy, only problem is that the examiners will have to take marks off for really small and petty things to make an even spread because the stkoloji section of vcaa arent smart enough to realise that a harder exam will produce an even spread without the need of taking marks off for things that dont measure your knowledge, for example: im assuming they will take marks off for the sergio painter question if u did not make any reference to the actual door and the wall and what ever and you merely stated that "the contour of a figure is not noticeable thus the figure is harder to separate from the ground"

amyminchin

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 281
  • Finished...
Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
« Reply #162 on: June 12, 2008, 06:24:54 pm »
I liked that exam :) it was nice.
I think I did fairly well... the multiple choice=easy. Except stupid Ames Room.  >:( but alas.


I said expectation for the ambigous figure one- emma jane had been told she was seeing a pic of a young woman and kirk had been told that the pic was an ambiguous pic so he looked for the old woman.

Age isn't a factor in the perceptual set is it? Isn't it only context, past experience, expectation and something else... maybe it is age? I dont know.
2008
english.further.psych.lit.media
ENTER of 85.05

It is a mistake to think you can solve any major problems just with potatoes. - Douglas Adams

2009-
Arts/Teaching (Secondary) at ACU

jonny

  • Victorian
  • Fresh Poster
  • *
  • Posts: 2
Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
« Reply #163 on: June 12, 2008, 06:36:41 pm »
i dont think you can say age itself, you must elaborate and say that the older woman will hang around next to older ppl and so she will ahve a readiness to perceive the figure as an old lady cause of that. something like that maybe

amyminchin

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 281
  • Finished...
Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
« Reply #164 on: June 12, 2008, 06:49:45 pm »
Yeah. Did eeryone else find it uber short? I finsihed with like half an hour to spare and spent it annotating my question answer booklet (multiple choice section) with things like "kryptonite. lol. limitations- can't administer PET scan to superman" and such things while double checking everysingle question in the book. I made a stupid mistake in my prac exam (psychological/physiological. GAH!) so i looked over it abotu tne time for such mistakes.

Good luck for the GAT tomoz!
2008
english.further.psych.lit.media
ENTER of 85.05

It is a mistake to think you can solve any major problems just with potatoes. - Douglas Adams

2009-
Arts/Teaching (Secondary) at ACU