both are hygroscopic, that's why I just wanted to check that the higher molar mass was the only factor
Damn, my chem teacher, said NaOH is the one that absorbs moisture readily, whilst the latter didn't =\
PS: But when you look at it in real life perspective, NaOH would attract moisture far faster than Anhydrous Sodium Carbonate? Having said that, you guys just proved my chem teacher wrong ):, actually, I'm quite unsure now. Unless Molar mass, is the only answer?
Just checked on internet. If this is any valid
PS No .2: Anhydrous sodium carbonate is not deliquescent, but it does absorb carbon dioxide and water from the air to give sodium hydrogencarbonate. When heated, this sodium hydrogencarbonate decomposes back to sodium carbonate again <<<<Reason for Primary Standard
contrary to
Sodium hydroxide suffers from two problems: it is deliquescent (absorbs water from the air); it also absorbs carbon dioxide from the air to give a surface layer of sodium carbonate and sodium hydrogencarbonate.