Rules of Evidence

[panicatthelunchbar]

Hi everyone,

Can someone please help me with this question?

Why is it important to have rules of evidence, to ensure a fair trial?

Any help would be appreciated

[ech_93]

It is important to have rules of evidence, because they ensure:
-The parties are treated fairly
-The jury is not distracted by irrelevant material
-Unreliable or illegally obtained evidence is not heard by the court
-Evidence is not unduly prejudicial to the defendant

[panicatthelunchbar]

Thanks! But I don't understand HOW parties are treated fairly through the use of rules of evidence?

[ech_93]

Ohh, sorry... I think it is because its consistent, so parties will be treated the same each time. The other reasons I listed could sort of explain 'how' as well.

The jury not being distracted by irrelevant material would mean they are treated fairly by the jury. The jury would hear the facts of the case, and only those facts which would make it fair.

Does that make sense, or help at all?

[Hellhole]

Not only what ech_93 said, but irrelevant material takes time to present, takes money to obtain and having it presented costs money. To ensure there is a fair trial, all aspects of an effective trial must be covered as well as ensuring a party has their rights seen to. That includes the aspect of a timely resolution - when irrelevant material is disregarded, the trial isn't dragged out more than it should and it costs the parties less money (in court costs, legal fees and even stationary).

Also, briefs, interrogatories, etc. all ensure that the parties can determine what is relevant and what is not, and as such present it in court. The paper trail and communication between both parties allows those to base a defence (or prosecution) around certain evidence that will be presented in court, thus determining what is relevant and what is not.