Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

November 01, 2025, 01:05:19 pm

Author Topic: Where are you guys up to in Chemistry?  (Read 4038 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

thushan

  • ATAR Notes Lecturer
  • Honorary Moderator
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 4959
  • Respect: +626
Re: Where are you guys up to in Chemistry?
« Reply #15 on: April 19, 2011, 10:32:21 am »
0
Not yet. Actually I'll just quickly read the NMR notes and actually try this qn properly.
Managing Director  and Senior Content Developer - Decode Publishing (2020+)
http://www.decodeguides.com.au

Basic Physician Trainee - Monash Health (2019-)
Medical Intern - Alfred Hospital (2018)
MBBS (Hons.) - Monash Uni
BMedSci (Hons.) - Monash Uni

Former ATARNotes Lecturer for Chemistry, Biology

thushan

  • ATAR Notes Lecturer
  • Honorary Moderator
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 4959
  • Respect: +626
Re: Where are you guys up to in Chemistry?
« Reply #16 on: April 19, 2011, 11:00:46 am »
0
I might have the answer...but there's an issue with it.

I worked out that a R-CH2-CH2-OH is needed. I have a feeling that there are more than 4 proton environments, but that the 7.25 one (which is the aromatic one I think) is really 3 environments 'fused' into one...

I propose that it could be Ph-CH2-CH2-OH.

I just need to do a little reading - I don't get NMR. Properly.
Managing Director  and Senior Content Developer - Decode Publishing (2020+)
http://www.decodeguides.com.au

Basic Physician Trainee - Monash Health (2019-)
Medical Intern - Alfred Hospital (2018)
MBBS (Hons.) - Monash Uni
BMedSci (Hons.) - Monash Uni

Former ATARNotes Lecturer for Chemistry, Biology

Jdog

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 846
  • Respect: +19
Re: Where are you guys up to in Chemistry?
« Reply #17 on: April 19, 2011, 11:04:37 am »
0
tush you have you guys done all the bio-molecules stuff in chem? peters is still up to organic, just starte

Mao

  • CH41RMN
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 9181
  • Respect: +390
  • School: Kambrya College
  • School Grad Year: 2008
Re: Where are you guys up to in Chemistry?
« Reply #18 on: April 19, 2011, 12:18:56 pm »
0
I might have the answer...but there's an issue with it.

I worked out that a R-CH2-CH2-OH is needed. I have a feeling that there are more than 4 proton environments, but that the 7.25 one (which is the aromatic one I think) is really 3 environments 'fused' into one...

I propose that it could be Ph-CH2-CH2-OH.

I just need to do a little reading - I don't get NMR. Properly.

post spectrum.
Editor for ATARNotes Chemistry study guides.

VCE 2008 | Monash BSc (Chem., Appl. Math.) 2009-2011 | UoM BScHon (Chem.) 2012 | UoM PhD (Chem.) 2013-2015

luken93

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3060
  • Respect: +114
Re: Where are you guys up to in Chemistry?
« Reply #19 on: April 19, 2011, 12:31:33 pm »
0
I might have the answer...but there's an issue with it.

I worked out that a R-CH2-CH2-OH is needed. I have a feeling that there are more than 4 proton environments, but that the 7.25 one (which is the aromatic one I think) is really 3 environments 'fused' into one...

I propose that it could be Ph-CH2-CH2-OH.

I just need to do a little reading - I don't get NMR. Properly.

post spectrum.
It's alright, we are quite sure we have it now!!!

But anyway, confirmation from you would be nice :P

BTW, it's CHM1011
"(b) An unknown organic compound has a molecular formula of C8H10O and the
following spectral data;
IR: 3340 cm-1, 13C NMR: δ140, 128, 127, 124, 62, and 39, 1H NMR: δ 2.01 (1H,
broad singlet, exchanges with D2O), 2.87 (2H, triplet), 4.85 (2H, triplet), 7.25 (5H,
multiplet). [chemical shift (integration, splitting)]."

Attached was the preliminary and now final structure that we think it could be...
« Last Edit: April 19, 2011, 12:33:47 pm by luken93 »
2010: Business Management [47]
2011: English [44]   |   Chemistry [45]  |   Methods [44]   |   Specialist [42]   |   MUEP Chemistry [5.0]   |   ATAR: 99.60
UMAT: 69 | 56 | 82 | = [69 / 98th Percentile]
2012: MBBS I @ Monash

Mao

  • CH41RMN
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 9181
  • Respect: +390
  • School: Kambrya College
  • School Grad Year: 2008
Re: Where are you guys up to in Chemistry?
« Reply #20 on: April 19, 2011, 12:34:19 pm »
0
Yeah, you've nailed it.
Editor for ATARNotes Chemistry study guides.

VCE 2008 | Monash BSc (Chem., Appl. Math.) 2009-2011 | UoM BScHon (Chem.) 2012 | UoM PhD (Chem.) 2013-2015

luken93

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3060
  • Respect: +114
Re: Where are you guys up to in Chemistry?
« Reply #21 on: April 19, 2011, 12:43:43 pm »
0
Yeah, you've nailed it.
Yay!

The thing we were unsure of, is that the difference between the H environments of the ring is negligible/small enough that it wouldn't produce separate peaks? Or is it that they do, hence the multiplicity?
2010: Business Management [47]
2011: English [44]   |   Chemistry [45]  |   Methods [44]   |   Specialist [42]   |   MUEP Chemistry [5.0]   |   ATAR: 99.60
UMAT: 69 | 56 | 82 | = [69 / 98th Percentile]
2012: MBBS I @ Monash

Mao

  • CH41RMN
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 9181
  • Respect: +390
  • School: Kambrya College
  • School Grad Year: 2008
Re: Where are you guys up to in Chemistry?
« Reply #22 on: April 19, 2011, 07:29:07 pm »
0
Yeah, you've nailed it.
Yay!

The thing we were unsure of, is that the difference between the H environments of the ring is negligible/small enough that it wouldn't produce separate peaks? Or is it that they do, hence the multiplicity?

They would produce different peaks, but of course there are complications. In an aromatic ring, spin-spin coupling occurs for neighbouring nuclei at 3 bonds away as well as 4 bonds away. These peaks however are all at very similar chemical shifts. What you end up with is quite a few 'doubly' coupled peaks right on top of each other. The resulting peaks are quite complex, and often our machines are not good enough to clearly see the shape of the peaks to allow us to assign them (due to limited resolution of the instruments). So we just note this complex peak pattern as a 'multiplet' (I prefer to call it 'cluster-fuck', most lecturers don't appreciate it though).
Editor for ATARNotes Chemistry study guides.

VCE 2008 | Monash BSc (Chem., Appl. Math.) 2009-2011 | UoM BScHon (Chem.) 2012 | UoM PhD (Chem.) 2013-2015

luken93

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3060
  • Respect: +114
Re: Where are you guys up to in Chemistry?
« Reply #23 on: April 19, 2011, 08:06:10 pm »
0
Hahaha fair enough, just wondering how you derived that name? :P

And yeah, it seemed too complex to have 5 equivalent 1H environments when it wasn't a ring, hence why I kept going back to that structure...

Cheers
2010: Business Management [47]
2011: English [44]   |   Chemistry [45]  |   Methods [44]   |   Specialist [42]   |   MUEP Chemistry [5.0]   |   ATAR: 99.60
UMAT: 69 | 56 | 82 | = [69 / 98th Percentile]
2012: MBBS I @ Monash

cranberry

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 310
  • Respect: +5
Re: Where are you guys up to in Chemistry?
« Reply #24 on: April 25, 2011, 09:32:51 pm »
0
What's everyone up to now in chem? ive done chaps..1-9 excluding 8..(maybe some motivation to cover 1 or 2 more chapters tomorrow :P)
Master of Civil Engineering and Bachelor of Science at the University of Melbourne

VCE:
2010: Revolutions [36]
2011: English 45, Legal Studies 38, Physics 37, Chemistry 34, Methods 36

94.85

nemolala

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 704
  • Respect: +27
Re: Where are you guys up to in Chemistry?
« Reply #25 on: April 25, 2011, 10:20:55 pm »
0
AOS 2 is the best part of chem

AOS 1 is just quite wacky and harder

Andiio

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1209
  • Respect: +14
Re: Where are you guys up to in Chemistry?
« Reply #26 on: April 25, 2011, 10:27:45 pm »
0
I might have the answer...but there's an issue with it.

I worked out that a R-CH2-CH2-OH is needed. I have a feeling that there are more than 4 proton environments, but that the 7.25 one (which is the aromatic one I think) is really 3 environments 'fused' into one...

I propose that it could be Ph-CH2-CH2-OH.

I just need to do a little reading - I don't get NMR. Properly.

post spectrum.
It's alright, we are quite sure we have it now!!!

But anyway, confirmation from you would be nice :P

BTW, it's CHM1011
"(b) An unknown organic compound has a molecular formula of C8H10O and the
following spectral data;
IR: 3340 cm-1, 13C NMR: δ140, 128, 127, 124, 62, and 39, 1H NMR: δ 2.01 (1H,
broad singlet, exchanges with D2O), 2.87 (2H, triplet), 4.85 (2H, triplet), 7.25 (5H,
multiplet). [chemical shift (integration, splitting)]."

Attached was the preliminary and now final structure that we think it could be...

That is Uni Chem, right? :P
2010: Chinese SL [43]
2011: English [47] | Mathematical Methods CAS [41]| Specialist Mathematics [38] | Chemistry [40] | Physics [37]
ATAR: 99.55

luken93

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3060
  • Respect: +114
Re: Where are you guys up to in Chemistry?
« Reply #27 on: April 25, 2011, 10:54:06 pm »
0
Yerp, don't worry about it haha
2010: Business Management [47]
2011: English [44]   |   Chemistry [45]  |   Methods [44]   |   Specialist [42]   |   MUEP Chemistry [5.0]   |   ATAR: 99.60
UMAT: 69 | 56 | 82 | = [69 / 98th Percentile]
2012: MBBS I @ Monash

Christiano

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 411
  • Why, Hello There
  • Respect: +12
Re: Where are you guys up to in Chemistry?
« Reply #28 on: April 26, 2011, 02:56:16 pm »
0
You know how worried I was getting when you guys were talking about NMR .. I didn't understand what was going on  :o
2010: Legal Studies [34]
2011: English [41] Italian [27], Further Mathematics [32], Biology[40], Chemistry[34]
90.65 ATAR
2012: Bachelor of Laws/Bachelor of Finance @ La Trobe University

The Detective

  • Guest
Re: Where are you guys up to in Chemistry?
« Reply #29 on: April 26, 2011, 03:22:47 pm »
0
half way through IR spectroscopy :(