Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

July 24, 2025, 10:58:09 pm

Author Topic: Shakespeare: To modernise or not to modernise?  (Read 487 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

MuggedByReality

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 606
  • Respect: +5
Shakespeare: To modernise or not to modernise?
« on: April 15, 2011, 12:32:20 am »
0


      The maker of the video has thinks so; the writer of the article trenchantly disagrees.
 
    http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/tobyyoung/100082724/anti-free-schools-fanatic-scores-spectacular-own-goal/
"People living deeply have no fear of death"
                                      -Anais Nin

"In the 2nd grade, they asked us what we wanted to be. I said I wanted to be a ballplayer and they laughed. In the 8th grade they asked the same question and I said a ballplayer again and they laughed a little more. By the 11th grade no one was laughing."
  -Johnny Bench, Hall of Fame baseball player

EvangelionZeta

  • Quintessence of Dust
  • Honorary Moderator
  • ATAR Notes Superstar
  • *******
  • Posts: 2435
  • Respect: +288
Re: Shakespeare: To modernise or not to modernise?
« Reply #1 on: April 27, 2011, 07:20:50 pm »
0
Modernizing Shakespeare alters the meaning of it all - half of Shakespeare is the language...
---

Finished VCE in 2010 and now teaching professionally. For any inquiries, email me at [email protected].

Eriny

  • The lamp of enlightenment
  • Honorary Moderator
  • ATAR Notes Superstar
  • *******
  • Posts: 2954
  • Respect: +100
Re: Shakespeare: To modernise or not to modernise?
« Reply #2 on: April 28, 2011, 11:06:25 am »
0
I think that providing 'translations' so that students can follow the basic story is a good idea, but I agree that if you want to actually enjoy Shakespeare, you do have to read the non-modernised version. Or see it performed.