Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

November 01, 2025, 03:47:01 pm

Author Topic: URGENT: jane1234's Specialist Questions...  (Read 4272 times)  Share 

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

jane1234

  • Guest
URGENT: jane1234's Specialist Questions...
« on: July 08, 2011, 01:17:33 pm »
0
Question: Use a vector method to prove that the diagonals of a rhombus intersect at right angles.

Could someone please explain how you do this?

Thanks guys.  :)
« Last Edit: October 11, 2011, 10:41:06 pm by jane1234 »

brightsky

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3136
  • Respect: +200
Re: Vector Question!!
« Reply #1 on: July 08, 2011, 01:30:55 pm »
0
let one side of the rhombus be a and an adjacent side be b such that the first diagonal is a+b.
we know from rhombus properties that the diagonals bisect each other, so the second diagonal can be given by 1/2(a+b) - a = 1/2b - 1/2a = 1/2(b - a).
(a+b).1/2(b-a) = 1/2(b.b -a.a) = 1/2(|b|^2 - |a|^2). since |b| = |a|, then this equals 0, completing the proof.
2020 - 2021: Master of Public Health, The University of Sydney
2017 - 2020: Doctor of Medicine, The University of Melbourne
2014 - 2016: Bachelor of Biomedicine, The University of Melbourne
2013 ATAR: 99.95

Currently selling copies of the VCE Chinese Exam Revision Book and UMEP Maths Exam Revision Book, and accepting students for Maths Methods and Specialist Maths Tutoring in 2020!

jane1234

  • Guest
Re: Vector Question!!
« Reply #2 on: July 08, 2011, 01:36:24 pm »
0
Hmm ... get most of it but could you say that the second diagonal is simply a - b (because the vector opposite the a will be equivalent to a)? Or is that completely wrong?
I don't get how you found the second diagonal... ???

brightsky

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3136
  • Respect: +200
Re: Vector Question!!
« Reply #3 on: July 08, 2011, 01:40:24 pm »
0
oh woops...haha that was stupid of me. yes that's much easier, i was remembering the proof i did for a kite, which doesn't have parallel sides. but this one is just (a+b).(a-b) =0.
2020 - 2021: Master of Public Health, The University of Sydney
2017 - 2020: Doctor of Medicine, The University of Melbourne
2014 - 2016: Bachelor of Biomedicine, The University of Melbourne
2013 ATAR: 99.95

Currently selling copies of the VCE Chinese Exam Revision Book and UMEP Maths Exam Revision Book, and accepting students for Maths Methods and Specialist Maths Tutoring in 2020!

jane1234

  • Guest
Re: Vector Question!!
« Reply #4 on: July 08, 2011, 01:42:56 pm »
0
Okay, I think I get it now :D Thanks heaps!

jane1234

  • Guest
Re: jane1234's Specialist Questions...
« Reply #5 on: July 19, 2011, 02:28:46 pm »
0
Hey guys... another vector question. :( But it's not a proof (I think I finally get them haha)!

A radar station tracks a jet fighter flying with constant speed. If the radar station is considered to be at the origin, the fighter's starting position is 2i + 8j + k and 1 minute later it is at 8i - 4j + 13k. The units are in kms.

a) State the vector which indicates the path of the fighter. Got this, it's 6i - 12j + 12k.

b) State a unit vector in the direction of this path. Got this, it's 1/3(i - 2j + 2k).

c) Find a vector, in terms of m, which represents the position of the fighter at any time along the path. Got this, it's m/3(i - 2j + 2k).

d) Find the point along the path where the fighter is closest to the station (the origin).

Answer is 1/3(10i + 16j +11k).

No idea how to do part d) !! Any help appreciated. :)

xZero

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 898
  • Respect: +68
Re: jane1234's Specialist Questions...
« Reply #6 on: July 19, 2011, 03:50:30 pm »
0
hmm you sure everything else is right? your solution to part c) and the answer to part d) doesnt match up
2009: Chinese SLA
2010: English, Maths method[45,A+ A+ A+], Specialist maths[44,A+,A,A+], Physics[40,A,A+,A+], Psychology Atar:94.75
2011-2015: Bachelor of Aerospace Engineering/Science @ Monash

Methods/Spesh/Physics tuition

jane1234

  • Guest
Re: jane1234's Specialist Questions...
« Reply #7 on: July 19, 2011, 04:04:41 pm »
0
Yes those are the answers from the back of the book as well. No idea how they got d) ... :-\
If you didn't know the answer to d) how would you work it out?

xZero

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 898
  • Respect: +68
Re: jane1234's Specialist Questions...
« Reply #8 on: July 19, 2011, 04:13:45 pm »
0
Its basically the same as 'find the closest point on a graph to the origin' questions you see in methods, draw a line from the graph/path to origin, find the magnitude and differentiate it to find the closest point. I'll give the question a go later, still eating lunch :P
2009: Chinese SLA
2010: English, Maths method[45,A+ A+ A+], Specialist maths[44,A+,A,A+], Physics[40,A,A+,A+], Psychology Atar:94.75
2011-2015: Bachelor of Aerospace Engineering/Science @ Monash

Methods/Spesh/Physics tuition

xZero

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 898
  • Respect: +68
Re: jane1234's Specialist Questions...
« Reply #9 on: July 19, 2011, 05:08:00 pm »
0
okay so you know the direction of the path, it  starts at (2,8,1) and the gradient would be m/3(1,-2,2). This gives us the actual equation of the path (2,8,1)+m/3(1,-2,2) or (2+m/3)i + (8-2m/3)j + (1+2m/3)k. Find the magnitude, diff it and find m.

If you ceebs working it out click this link http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=sqrt%28+%282%2Bm%2F3%29^2+%2B+%288-2m%2F3%29^2+%2B+%281%2B2m%2F3%29^2+%29, it shows the global min value for m
« Last Edit: July 19, 2011, 05:10:38 pm by xZero »
2009: Chinese SLA
2010: English, Maths method[45,A+ A+ A+], Specialist maths[44,A+,A,A+], Physics[40,A,A+,A+], Psychology Atar:94.75
2011-2015: Bachelor of Aerospace Engineering/Science @ Monash

Methods/Spesh/Physics tuition

jane1234

  • Guest
Re: jane1234's Specialist Questions...
« Reply #10 on: July 19, 2011, 05:20:08 pm »
0
Why is the gradient considered m/3(1,-2,2)?? For a 2D vector xi + yj the gradient is just y/x... how does it work for 3D??

xZero

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 898
  • Respect: +68
Re: jane1234's Specialist Questions...
« Reply #11 on: July 19, 2011, 05:28:41 pm »
0
it should be gradient vector aka directional vector, my bad.
2009: Chinese SLA
2010: English, Maths method[45,A+ A+ A+], Specialist maths[44,A+,A,A+], Physics[40,A,A+,A+], Psychology Atar:94.75
2011-2015: Bachelor of Aerospace Engineering/Science @ Monash

Methods/Spesh/Physics tuition

jane1234

  • Guest
Re: jane1234's Specialist Questions...
« Reply #12 on: July 19, 2011, 05:30:06 pm »
0
it should be gradient vector aka directional vector, my bad.

Ah that makes sense... thanks heaps for all your help :D

jane1234

  • Guest
Re: jane1234's Specialist Questions...
« Reply #13 on: October 07, 2011, 02:49:03 pm »
0
Heffernan 2008 Exam 1:

Question 2:

A box of mass 5kg rests on a rough horizontal floor. Coefficient of friction is 0.1. A boy applies a horizontal dragging force D newtons to the box in an attempt to move it.

a) Find the values of D if the box is not at the point of moving across the floor.

I got D E [0,4.9)

Answers just say D < 4.9

Just wondering who was right...? Can you "apply" a force of a negative value?

Thanks in advance :)

b^3

  • Honorary Moderator
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3529
  • Overloading, just don't do it.
  • Respect: +631
  • School: Western Suburbs Area
  • School Grad Year: 2011
Re: jane1234's Specialist Questions...
« Reply #14 on: October 07, 2011, 02:52:58 pm »
0
Heffernan 2008 Exam 1:

Question 2:

A box of mass 5kg rests on a rough horizontal floor. Coefficient of friction is 0.1. A boy applies a horizontal dragging force D newtons to the box in an attempt to move it.

a) Find the values of D if the box is not at the point of moving across the floor.

I got D E [0,4.9)

Answers just say D < 4.9

Just wondering who was right...? Can you "apply" a force of a negative value?

Thanks in advance :)
Logically you can't since it's negative, technically you can since it is a vector, it would just be in the opposite direction. But then they say it is a 'dragging' force, so that would have to be in the one direction. So I'd think you'd be correct, D E [0,4.9).
2012-2016: Aerospace Engineering/Science (Double Major in Applied Mathematics - Monash Uni)
TI-NSPIRE GUIDES: METH, SPESH

Co-Authored AtarNotes' Maths Study Guides


I'm starting to get too old for this... May be on here or irc from time to time.