AS THE "expert" quoted in the front page story on international students ("Experts warn of campus ghettos", The Age, 23/7), I am deeply disturbed at the way the issue was handled by the paper. In briefing The Age, I said that there was no visible tension between international and local students, but the two populations are largely separated and there is potential for backlash and resentment down the track if we don't draw local students into internationalisation. Yet the headline describes "ghettos" and "resentment" as if these are established facts.
The article begins with a "widening gulf" between international and local students, without substantive evidence. In some editions of the paper, the headline refers to "experts" in support. The article more accurately reports me (the sole expert cited) as saying that there is no problem, just a potential problem!
This separation between student groups is endemic to English-speaking education. But we can do better in Melbourne than the United States and UK. Claiming there is a racialised conflict that does not exist can only take us backward.
Simon Marginson, professor of higher education, University of Melbourne
The Age is now just as bad any other tabloid, in terms of sensationalist reporting without the backing of any substantive evidence.