i see four problems with this current debate:
1) we're stuck on the definition of

, which I believe represents the principle branch, but interpreted differently by others.
the habitual thing I have learnt to do is to apply the

when a square is removed:
^{1/2})
as opposed to counting two branches in a square root [a principle branch evaluation in my terms]:

*this is also convention used in mathematical computing solutions
2) failing that,
^{n/2}=(i)^n,\; n\in \mathbb{R})
is not completely wrong, it represents a branch of solutions. the statement "only for even natural numbers" is right to the same degree as it is wrong.
3) this discussion is way beyond the scope of the question itself. one might argue that the even integers restriction is applied strictly for mathematical correctness, but I would argue that given the context, it was meant simply so that year 11 students can recognise

4) [personal opinion] I do not find the attitude and manner in which the disagreement has been voiced to be appropriate nor acceptable. In an intellectual environment such as this, it will be more constructive to refute a statement with reasoning rather than simply state "you are wrong". It does not come friendly, and I have had complaints from others regarding this. Please heed this advice.