Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

February 21, 2026, 10:35:20 pm

Author Topic: Calorimerty i think.... ^.^  (Read 937 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

dusty_girl1144

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1047
  • THE FAMOUS DUSTY CAT! MEOW ...
  • Respect: +7
Calorimerty i think.... ^.^
« on: August 30, 2008, 09:57:54 pm »
0
here is the questions for u chem people out there....

q1: in the calorimeter manual, the calorimeter constant is found to be lower then the calculated value. give a possible explanation for this discrepancy. therefore outline a more suitable methods for calibrating the calorimeter

q2: calculate the energy content of food sample (i dont get what formular im actually meant to use...)
  mass of food : 1.07g
  initial temp : 20.87
  final temp: 26.41
is it mean to be the enthalpy change? :s thats the only formular with an "m" component


q3: what is the heat combustion for the reaction of butane
2g and 100KJ of energy heat used.


thanxs everyone :)
.:*|  Dusty™ |*:.

*Specialist Maths.
*Maths Methods.
*Chemistry.
*Legal Studies.
*English.


As if this is a place where people dont laugh at your ENTER.

ENTER does not determine how smart you are. so you can STFU now...thanks
also, PM ME if you have a problem. bring up a problem which CONCERNS ME only, not half of VN who also do the same action.
thanks

cara.mel

  • Guest
Re: Calorimerty i think.... ^.^
« Reply #1 on: August 30, 2008, 10:09:54 pm »
0
q1 - This means that more energy was used when calculating it than is needed to heat it - some was lost somewhere somehow. I don't remember all the errors but having lid off etc are some. Other people can give better answers

q2 - You need more info than those 3 numbers

q3 - n(C4H10) = m/Mr = 2/58
so 1/29 moles releases 100kJ of energy
=> 1 mole releases 29 *100kJ of energy => delta H = -2900kJ (using ratios)

dusty_girl1144

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1047
  • THE FAMOUS DUSTY CAT! MEOW ...
  • Respect: +7
Re: Calorimerty i think.... ^.^
« Reply #2 on: August 30, 2008, 10:12:59 pm »
0
thanxs caramel. but what more info do u need for q 2?
.:*|  Dusty™ |*:.

*Specialist Maths.
*Maths Methods.
*Chemistry.
*Legal Studies.
*English.


As if this is a place where people dont laugh at your ENTER.

ENTER does not determine how smart you are. so you can STFU now...thanks
also, PM ME if you have a problem. bring up a problem which CONCERNS ME only, not half of VN who also do the same action.
thanks

cara.mel

  • Guest
Re: Calorimerty i think.... ^.^
« Reply #3 on: August 30, 2008, 10:16:25 pm »
0
Something to do with the calibration factor of what you burnt it in.

Essentially it is saying 'I burnt 1.07g of food and the thing went up by 5 degrees'. But that is useless because from that you can't tell at all how much energy was needed to raise it 5 degrees (imagine having some tiny calorimeter and then one as big as a room, very different amounts of energy would be needed to raise each by the same amount)

Pandemonium

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 200
  • Respect: +1
Re: Calorimerty i think.... ^.^
« Reply #4 on: August 31, 2008, 01:02:54 pm »
0
you need the calibration results.

eg.
5 volts
2.1 amperes
124 seconds

increase in calorimeter temperature of 5 degrees.

CALIBRATION
Cf = VIt/dT (dT = delta T)
Cf = 5x2.1x124/5 = 260.4J/degreesC

DETERMINING ENERGY CONTENT IN SAMPLE
E(released/absorbed) = Cf.dT (this dT is from the sample)
etc. etc.