Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

September 21, 2025, 03:23:11 pm

Author Topic: MAV doesn't like to make much sense  (Read 8335 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

AppleXY

  • Life cannot be Delta Hedged.
  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Superstar
  • ******
  • Posts: 2619
  • Even when the bears bite, confidence never dies.
  • Respect: +16
Re: MAV doesn't like to make much sense
« Reply #15 on: September 23, 2008, 05:52:56 pm »
0
TSFX's exam are over the top at times as well. But I think MAV is probably the best because the writers may be VCAA examiners ;)

2009 - BBus (Econometrics/Economics&Fin) @ Monash


For Email: click here

Need a question answered? Merspi it!

[quote="Benjamin F

bigtick

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 152
  • Respect: +1
Re: MAV doesn't like to make much sense
« Reply #16 on: September 23, 2008, 06:11:41 pm »
0
Nothing wrong with Q2 answer, assuming both are at rest initially. When both are moving, acceleration changes. For fixed angle, acc is a function of time.

Mao

  • CH41RMN
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 9181
  • Respect: +390
  • School: Kambrya College
  • School Grad Year: 2008
Re: MAV doesn't like to make much sense
« Reply #17 on: September 23, 2008, 06:47:03 pm »
0
Ahh, bigtick, I was anticipating your replies :D

Self-solve: 1st question

for x<0 and -1<y<1, z+i lies in the second quadrant, and z-i lies in the third quadrant.

hence, arg(z+i) is positive, and arg(z-i) is negative, and , let the conjugate of z-i be w, also lies in the second quadrant.



now, the sum of two angles in the second quadrant is bounded within and , and hence will not equal to , the relationship cannot exist for x<0 and -1<y<1


argument of z is not unique, any two arguments of z differ by an integer multiple of 2pi.

that is quite true, and I have considered that. But these don't really matter as I took the tangent on both sides in my calculations.
Editor for ATARNotes Chemistry study guides.

VCE 2008 | Monash BSc (Chem., Appl. Math.) 2009-2011 | UoM BScHon (Chem.) 2012 | UoM PhD (Chem.) 2013-2015

bigtick

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 152
  • Respect: +1
Re: MAV doesn't like to make much sense
« Reply #18 on: September 23, 2008, 08:16:00 pm »
0
They do matter. E.g. arg(z) = 19pi/12, arg(w) = -2pi/3, arg(z) - arg(w) = 27pi/12.
But arg(w) also = 2pi - 2pi/3 = 4pi/3. Now arg(z) - arg(w) = pi/4.

Mao

  • CH41RMN
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 9181
  • Respect: +390
  • School: Kambrya College
  • School Grad Year: 2008
Re: MAV doesn't like to make much sense
« Reply #19 on: September 24, 2008, 10:23:09 am »
0


Editor for ATARNotes Chemistry study guides.

VCE 2008 | Monash BSc (Chem., Appl. Math.) 2009-2011 | UoM BScHon (Chem.) 2012 | UoM PhD (Chem.) 2013-2015

dcc

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1198
  • Respect: +55
  • School Grad Year: 2008
Re: MAV doesn't like to make much sense
« Reply #20 on: September 24, 2008, 01:00:15 pm »
0
Do you have those questions written in a coherent fashion?  I cannot begin to understand what the question is asking the way its written up at the moment :P

Mao

  • CH41RMN
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 9181
  • Respect: +390
  • School: Kambrya College
  • School Grad Year: 2008
Re: MAV doesn't like to make much sense
« Reply #21 on: September 24, 2008, 01:05:46 pm »
0
in bold are the questions

the last question, pulling force refers to the force up the slope inclined at 30 degrees.
Editor for ATARNotes Chemistry study guides.

VCE 2008 | Monash BSc (Chem., Appl. Math.) 2009-2011 | UoM BScHon (Chem.) 2012 | UoM PhD (Chem.) 2013-2015

dcc

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1198
  • Respect: +55
  • School Grad Year: 2008
Re: MAV doesn't like to make much sense
« Reply #22 on: September 24, 2008, 01:22:56 pm »
0
Did you draw those pictures?

Mao

  • CH41RMN
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 9181
  • Respect: +390
  • School: Kambrya College
  • School Grad Year: 2008
Re: MAV doesn't like to make much sense
« Reply #23 on: September 24, 2008, 02:02:16 pm »
0
yeah.,..
Editor for ATARNotes Chemistry study guides.

VCE 2008 | Monash BSc (Chem., Appl. Math.) 2009-2011 | UoM BScHon (Chem.) 2012 | UoM PhD (Chem.) 2013-2015

/0

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 4124
  • Respect: +45
Re: MAV doesn't like to make much sense
« Reply #24 on: September 25, 2008, 12:04:16 am »
0
In the last question what is g? ?

shinny

  • VN MVP 2010
  • Honorary Moderator
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 4327
  • Respect: +256
  • School: Melbourne High School
  • School Grad Year: 2008
Re: MAV doesn't like to make much sense
« Reply #25 on: September 25, 2008, 12:09:51 am »
0
Yeh, that's the VCAA standard for g
MBBS (hons) - Monash University

YR11 '07: Biology 49
YR12 '08: Chemistry 47; Spesh 41; Methods 49; Business Management 50; English 43

ENTER: 99.70


Collin Li

  • VCE Tutor
  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 4957
  • Respect: +17
Re: MAV doesn't like to make much sense
« Reply #26 on: September 25, 2008, 12:13:37 am »
0
Yeh, that's the VCAA standard for g

VCAA Specialist Mathematics standard.

The VCAA Physics standard is . I've always wondered why the Physics subject uses the less accurate of the two...

shinny

  • VN MVP 2010
  • Honorary Moderator
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 4327
  • Respect: +256
  • School: Melbourne High School
  • School Grad Year: 2008
Re: MAV doesn't like to make much sense
« Reply #27 on: September 25, 2008, 12:15:37 am »
0
Well I don't do physics so yeh, I wouldn't know =P I assume they do because it makes it easier for calculations and such, and physics is more testing the concepts rather than the arithmetic side of things...although 9.8 doesn't really complicate it that much anyhow
MBBS (hons) - Monash University

YR11 '07: Biology 49
YR12 '08: Chemistry 47; Spesh 41; Methods 49; Business Management 50; English 43

ENTER: 99.70


gta007

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 231
  • University of Melbourne Student
  • Respect: +6
Re: MAV doesn't like to make much sense
« Reply #28 on: September 25, 2008, 02:03:26 pm »
0
Anyone have the solutions to the Neap Exam 2 exam?
2008 ENTER = 97.90

BCom @ UoM - I love you Melbourne!

Mao

  • CH41RMN
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 9181
  • Respect: +390
  • School: Kambrya College
  • School Grad Year: 2008
Re: MAV doesn't like to make much sense
« Reply #29 on: September 25, 2008, 02:18:23 pm »
0
Anyone have the solutions to the Neap Exam 2 exam?

which year?
Editor for ATARNotes Chemistry study guides.

VCE 2008 | Monash BSc (Chem., Appl. Math.) 2009-2011 | UoM BScHon (Chem.) 2012 | UoM PhD (Chem.) 2013-2015