Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

October 22, 2025, 12:34:57 am

Author Topic: Insight 2008 MM Exam1 Trial Error  (Read 2002 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

pHysiX

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 217
  • RAWRRRRRR!
  • Respect: +2
  • School: Wellington Secondary College
  • School Grad Year: 2009
Insight 2008 MM Exam1 Trial Error
« on: October 26, 2008, 07:29:02 pm »
0
Question 1 b):

the answer says loge|x-3|+4

however, if we look at the derivative function's domain, we see that it's (-infinity, 3). Therefore, the answer should be the negative reflection of the log, i.e.

loge(3-x)+4.

Please tell me if you agree with me because this type of question appeared in 2006 Sample Exams and they clearly solved it like that. =]
« Last Edit: October 26, 2008, 07:30:40 pm by pHysiX »
2010: BBiomedSC/LLB
2011: BE (ECSE)/LLB

2011: Dean's Honours (Engineering)
2012: Dean's Honours (Engineering)

"Hey sweety! I love you like e^x"
"Always exponentially increasing and never equal to zero"
<3

ReVeL

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 972
  • Respect: +3
Re: Insight 2008 MM Exam1 Trial Error
« Reply #1 on: October 26, 2008, 07:35:57 pm »
0
Wouldn't happen to have a version you could upload?

I've only got insight 2008 exam 2...
||  2008 VCE Graduate  ||  BCom @ UoM [Accounting & Finance Majors] - Completing 3rd year  ||

danieltennis

  • Guest
Re: Insight 2008 MM Exam1 Trial Error
« Reply #2 on: October 26, 2008, 07:37:53 pm »
0
Godspeed.

danieltennis

  • Guest
Re: Insight 2008 MM Exam1 Trial Error
« Reply #3 on: October 26, 2008, 07:39:10 pm »
0
Solutions

shinny

  • VN MVP 2010
  • Honorary Moderator
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 4327
  • Respect: +256
  • School: Melbourne High School
  • School Grad Year: 2008
Re: Insight 2008 MM Exam1 Trial Error
« Reply #4 on: October 26, 2008, 08:14:24 pm »
0
I don't think its necessarily an error, nor would you lose a mark for doing writing what they did, nor what you did; it's purely just a technicality. The domain restriction acts to give the answer you gave, but keeping the modulus has no difference in terms of the graph that is produced if you get what I mean, since the domain restriction still stays and produces what seems like .
MBBS (hons) - Monash University

YR11 '07: Biology 49
YR12 '08: Chemistry 47; Spesh 41; Methods 49; Business Management 50; English 43

ENTER: 99.70


pHysiX

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 217
  • RAWRRRRRR!
  • Respect: +2
  • School: Wellington Secondary College
  • School Grad Year: 2009
Re: Insight 2008 MM Exam1 Trial Error
« Reply #5 on: October 26, 2008, 08:16:32 pm »
0
mmm i agree with you there. but wen u look @ 2006 Sample Exam, I believe it's better to consider the other answer because it demonstrates that you understand functions etc. because really, the exams are about demonstrating knowledge.
2010: BBiomedSC/LLB
2011: BE (ECSE)/LLB

2011: Dean's Honours (Engineering)
2012: Dean's Honours (Engineering)

"Hey sweety! I love you like e^x"
"Always exponentially increasing and never equal to zero"
<3

riadnicolas

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 390
  • Respect: +1
Re: Insight 2008 MM Exam1 Trial Error
« Reply #6 on: October 26, 2008, 08:21:24 pm »
0
graphing the function might help you understand, compare gradient of modulus function and the derivative
VCE 2008 Enter: 97.15

English, 32
Chemistry, 42
Methods, 46
Specialist, 41
Business Management, 38
Umep Maths, <64 P>

Bachelor of Biomedicine-UOM 09

shinny

  • VN MVP 2010
  • Honorary Moderator
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 4327
  • Respect: +256
  • School: Melbourne High School
  • School Grad Year: 2008
Re: Insight 2008 MM Exam1 Trial Error
« Reply #7 on: October 26, 2008, 08:25:01 pm »
0
Its the equivalent of cases where you have say, . The modulus is UNNECESSARY because the inside will always be greater than 0, but that doesn't mean it's wrong. Same with the case above; although the domain restriction implies that the inside of the modulus will always be negative, it doesn't mean its wrong to keep it there. But as you said, I would remove the modulus too and put the 'more correct' version just as insurance.
MBBS (hons) - Monash University

YR11 '07: Biology 49
YR12 '08: Chemistry 47; Spesh 41; Methods 49; Business Management 50; English 43

ENTER: 99.70


Mao

  • CH41RMN
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 9181
  • Respect: +390
  • School: Kambrya College
  • School Grad Year: 2008
Re: Insight 2008 MM Exam1 Trial Error
« Reply #8 on: October 26, 2008, 09:38:25 pm »
0
Question 1 b):

the answer says loge|x-3|+4

however, if we look at the derivative function's domain, we see that it's (-infinity, 3). Therefore, the answer should be the negative reflection of the log, i.e.

loge(3-x)+4.

Please tell me if you agree with me because this type of question appeared in 2006 Sample Exams and they clearly solved it like that. =]

I gave the answer like you did, and you are correct.  However as other people have said, there is also a domain restriction.  This makes the modulus log function also correct.  On a VCAA exam, I'd write it how you did OR use the modulus log, however re-write the domain of the function, next to your answer, so they know you've limited it [as required in the question].

P.S. This isn't Mao.
Editor for ATARNotes Chemistry study guides.

VCE 2008 | Monash BSc (Chem., Appl. Math.) 2009-2011 | UoM BScHon (Chem.) 2012 | UoM PhD (Chem.) 2013-2015

Glockmeister

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1660
  • RIP Sweet Nothings.
  • Respect: +8
Re: Insight 2008 MM Exam1 Trial Error
« Reply #9 on: October 26, 2008, 10:13:50 pm »
0
Quote
P.S. This isn't Mao.

Huh? Has he finally manage to divide by zero?
"this post is more confusing than actual chemistry.... =S" - Mao

[22:07] <robbo> i luv u Glockmeister

<Glockmeister> like the people who like do well academically
<Glockmeister> tend to deny they actually do well
<%Neobeo> sounds like Ahmad0
<@Ahmad0> no
<@Ahmad0> sounds like Neobeo

2007: Mathematical Methods 37; Psychology 38
2008: English 33; Specialist Maths 32 ; Chemistry 38; IT: Applications 42
2009: Bachelor of Behavioural Neuroscience, Monash University.

amycourty

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 61
  • Respect: +1
Re: Insight 2008 MM Exam1 Trial Error
« Reply #10 on: October 27, 2008, 02:33:44 pm »
0
would anyone happen to have the insight 2008 exam 2 and be willing to share with me?  :angel:

we're nearly over. oh my god
english, literature, francais, methods and psych
hoping for 85+

Chocoholic

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 187
  • Respect: +1
Re: Insight 2008 MM Exam1 Trial Error
« Reply #11 on: October 27, 2008, 02:43:17 pm »
0

amycourty

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 61
  • Respect: +1
Re: Insight 2008 MM Exam1 Trial Error
« Reply #12 on: October 27, 2008, 05:32:54 pm »
0
thanks muchly
we're nearly over. oh my god
english, literature, francais, methods and psych
hoping for 85+