so say like you have 6 paragraphs not including intro and conclusion.... and 3 of them are made up of real life things?
I tend to have 3 body paragraphs, one for each idea with one example from my text which demonstrates that idea, followed by one example from supplementary material which demonstrates that idea
Same here. With each of my 4 paragraphs, I follow my topic sentence with examples from the text then I tie it together with broader ideas/an anecdote.
I am doing it in a similar manner, and my teacher really loves it.
In the exam i will be writing an expository piece with three body paragraphs. Each paragraph will deal with a seperate idea, and i will use evidence from the text to back it up. In my third paragraph i have now changed my course of direction - i will most likely include a different form of evidence (i.e an external example relating to history or something) just to give the examiners what they want. For 'Whose Reality' i usually talk a lot about a lot of philosophical matters such as morals and beliefs influencing perceptions and individual characteristics forming the basis of these morals. Nevertheless, i have also been told to remove a small smount of the textual evidence i have been including merely to make it not seem like a text response.
I think expository writing is so easy and enjoyable - i don't understand this whole percentage thing like jsimmo argued, but basically, this AOS is so broad that nearly anything goes. My only advice would be to not write a short story that goes on a rampage and deals with none of the ideas from the text/context. If you're writing in a creative manner, and closely relating the ideas to the prompt and to the text, then i think the examiners will treat each student differently.
Additionally, this is new to the study design, so of course everyone has different perspectives on how much evidence you should include and what form you should write it. The examiners are going to be marking a lot of varied pieces of writing - some will be deplorable, and others (like all of ours) will be extraordinarily awesome. Nontheless, everyone is different, just as the Context's argue, haha.
Sorry for my rant.