Yes, feeling of some relief, although I didn't mention water. Found this on what seems like a good source:
http://www.labs.agilent.com/botany/cacti_etc/html/evolution.html"Since the major processes of fossilization
generally require sedimentation of mineral materials over
vegetative/floral materials, you can realize very quickly that with
even a hypothetical [xerophytic] ancestor to the cacti (perhaps
Pereskia-like in appearance), the environmental factors that favor
fossil preservation (save for amber entombment) would have been an
unlikely combination of cacti and ample water for sedimentation.
Thus the fossil record for cacti is poor, or in fact absent."
Although my response wasn't so comprehensive as that....