Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

September 27, 2025, 01:54:38 am

Author Topic: Official Accounting Exam Discussion  (Read 15105 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

davo

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 17
Re: Official Accounting Exam Discussion
« Reply #60 on: November 06, 2008, 05:26:15 pm »
dammit i didnt take into account the gst clearing when doing the table.
will prob only lose 3 or 4 marks though.
how come so many people got A+ in mid year? there was 5 in my class

makesh

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 7
Re: Official Accounting Exam Discussion
« Reply #61 on: November 06, 2008, 08:18:03 pm »
Hmm...the last few were worth the most :(

I'm guessing it was...
21 Nov- Order : No effect x3
25th Nov- Deposit : Increase, Increase, No effect.
21st Dec- 15 beds delivery: Decrease, No effect, Decrease
15th Jan- Increase, Decrease, Increase.


21st is wrong, as u make a sale ur actually increasing assets overall, as debtors control increases at a higher rate then the decrease in stock control.   
 it should be increase, no effect , increase

cecille

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 6
Re: Official Accounting Exam Discussion
« Reply #62 on: November 06, 2008, 08:29:58 pm »
oshiz was there gst included in the increase/deacrease/no effect question? cos i remember in my last transactions i listed Liabilies as either inc/dec cos i was thinking about the gst..

ben4386

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 102
Re: Official Accounting Exam Discussion
« Reply #63 on: November 06, 2008, 08:44:41 pm »
oshiz was there gst included in the increase/deacrease/no effect question?

yeh look on the previous page, i made a post about this question.

for the last two transactions there was an effect in every equity and asset

cecille

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 6
Re: Official Accounting Exam Discussion
« Reply #64 on: November 06, 2008, 08:45:11 pm »
nvm just red someones' asnwer lawl.

what did you guys do for the depreciation question?

did you split the 25,000 into 21,000 (dep'ed at 12 months)  the 4000 the four thousand that was sold (dep`ed for like 9 months)
 then the new 8000 shopfittings at deprecn of 6 months then add?

and what was the cost of the deluxe guitars, did youzeszes include the freight charge? so total of 180 per unit? ps. did people record Gibner Ltd as a sundry Creditor when recording the insurance on delivery ?? or was it someone else who provided the insurance on credit that was supposed to be a period cost? (or was it a period cost at all?)

lmao i said the cash sale would improve because they budgeted that it would -.-" and since they have a goal they're probably going to work towards it with planning. lol...couldnt think of something proper.

this exam was harder than the mid year... so long i barely finished. but then again i didnt finisht eh mid years. but it seemed like you had more thinking to do with this one lol. def i reckon the A+ cut off will be lower than that of the mid years !


cecille

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 6
Re: Official Accounting Exam Discussion
« Reply #65 on: November 06, 2008, 08:45:33 pm »
thanks `

*Roxxii*

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 616
Re: Official Accounting Exam Discussion
« Reply #66 on: November 06, 2008, 09:17:48 pm »
Hmm...the last few were worth the most :(

I'm guessing it was...
21 Nov- Order : No effect x3
25th Nov- Deposit : Increase, Increase, No effect.
21st Dec- 15 beds delivery: Decrease, No effect, Decrease
15th Jan- Increase, Decrease, Increase.


21st is wrong, as u make a sale ur actually increasing assets overall, as debtors control increases at a higher rate then the decrease in stock control.  
 it should be increase, no effect , increase


Ooooops my bad :P
Was thinking too simplistically lol
Heyyy...this means that there's a chance i actually did it correctly in the exam :P
Coz i thought about it differently haha...hmmmmz
~2007~   * Further [41]

~2008~ * English [33]  * Accounting [39]  * Specialist [27]   * Methods [36]  * Further [45] :D  * Chinese S/L [26]

ENTER: 91.15

ii <3 Commerce #1

gtfo amy are you srs ? :P  I'm 18 are you BAH :P
FUCK JUST BECAUSE IM SMALL. :(
i have my boyfriend in my pants :P

xox.happy1.xox

  • Guest
Re: Official Accounting Exam Discussion
« Reply #67 on: November 06, 2008, 09:50:44 pm »
If Accounting was this hard, what hope do I have in Methods tomorrow? :(

EDIT: Sorry if this is irrelevant, but now I'm scared that VCAA are doing this with all their exams this year (except for English?  :idiot2:)

Athomas

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 211
Re: Official Accounting Exam Discussion
« Reply #68 on: November 06, 2008, 09:53:15 pm »
If Accounting was this hard, what hope do I have in Methods tomorrow? :(

EDIT: Sorry if this is irrelevant, but now I'm scared that VCAA are doing this with all their exams this year (except for English?  :idiot2:)

Oh dw, you'll beat me if it's any consolation (in methods).
2007: Software Development (40)
2008: English (35), Accounting (34), ITA (39), Legal (31), Methods CAS (24)
ENTER: 82.00
2009: BIT @ Swinburne (I Hope)

mrx

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 9
Re: Official Accounting Exam Discussion
« Reply #69 on: November 07, 2008, 03:08:23 pm »
hey guys....i think i stuffed up the product cost question...but i used that answer for the next question (cost price etc)....will i get consequential?

because i think that is all i got wrong and i think i could do very well (unless that screws me over)?

cheers in advance

HannahL

  • Victorian
  • Fresh Poster
  • *
  • Posts: 3
Re: Official Accounting Exam Discussion
« Reply #70 on: November 07, 2008, 06:59:27 pm »
The prepaid sales question wasn't that bad if you had done last years exam...
the part that was a deposit went in the GJ (the 4 beds) and the sale of the rest (11) went in the sales journal.
THey had something like that last year though and they accepted 2 answers. This year the question wasnt as hard though.
Basically they ordered it (doesn't require any recording)
Then a deposit was made (received prepaid revenue) but only for part of it
sold the 15 beds (requires a BDA and also an entry in the sales jounal)
then sold the extra 5 beds - so thats another normal sales entry

what we had to do was the GJ for the BDA of the 4 beds and then the regular sales entry for the other 11 that make up the 15...

Fyrefly

  • ★☆★ 一期一会 ★☆★
  • Honorary Moderator
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 4495
Re: Official Accounting Exam Discussion
« Reply #71 on: November 07, 2008, 08:56:28 pm »
hey guys....i think i stuffed up the product cost question...but i used that answer for the next question (cost price etc)....will i get consequential?

because i think that is all i got wrong and i think i could do very well (unless that screws me over)?

cheers in advance

U'll get consequential.

Examiners generally aim 2 only punish u once 4 a mistake.
|| BComm + DipLang (Jap) @ Monash ||

mrx

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 9
Re: Official Accounting Exam Discussion
« Reply #72 on: November 07, 2008, 08:59:35 pm »

[/quote]

U'll get consequential.

Examiners generally aim 2 only punish u once 4 a mistake.
[/quote]

Thats good now i feel confident of dropping less than 5 marks. I went with my gut on that product costing question and got it wrong, but i did get the prepaid sales part right so if im not punished for that as well its all good :)

Only one other question is troubling me but i gave a solid definition so that should help

Tauk

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 52
Re: Official Accounting Exam Discussion
« Reply #73 on: November 18, 2008, 11:20:56 pm »
owned

OMG IT WAS TERRIBLE. IM SO CUT ANGRY FUCKEN PISSED OFF.
THAT WAS A PIECE OF SHIT. WAS RIDICULOUSLY HARD. HOLY FUCK TOOK SO LONG WAS WRITING TO THE LAST SECOND AND JUST FINISHED ON TIME. IM SOO EMOTIONAL THAT I CAN BARELY FORM WORDS. HATE WORLD. HATE LIFE
BYE

Reversed ownage.
Well deserved too.
TOP 4
------------------
Russian [2007- 40 raw]
English
IT: Applications
Methods
------------------
Physics
Accounting