Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

May 16, 2026, 03:08:52 am

Author Topic: Suggested Solutions (VCAA Physics Unit 4 2008)  (Read 19593 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

We Want Peace.

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 92
Re: Suggested Solutions (VCAA Physics Unit 4 2008)
« Reply #30 on: November 12, 2008, 06:23:20 pm »
damn..i forgot that line below x axis should not be solid..
« Last Edit: November 12, 2008, 06:27:01 pm by We Want Peace. »

hippo326

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 20
Re: Suggested Solutions (VCAA Physics Unit 4 2008)
« Reply #31 on: November 12, 2008, 06:24:31 pm »
huh anyone rmb the unit for plank's constant? i was like wtf

champorado

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 774
  • f yeh.
Re: Suggested Solutions (VCAA Physics Unit 4 2008)
« Reply #32 on: November 12, 2008, 06:27:38 pm »
sida: less than me! :p

actually, how would that work? wouldn't it be weird having space for freq < 0?

Nelle91

  • Guest
Re: Suggested Solutions (VCAA Physics Unit 4 2008)
« Reply #33 on: November 12, 2008, 06:27:48 pm »
Is discrete spectrum the same as line spectrum?

amin_ali

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 11
Re: Suggested Solutions (VCAA Physics Unit 4 2008)
« Reply #34 on: November 12, 2008, 06:30:08 pm »
wat did question 15 in electric power ask i got 29.3 writin here for sum reason lol

We Want Peace.

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 92
Re: Suggested Solutions (VCAA Physics Unit 4 2008)
« Reply #35 on: November 12, 2008, 06:34:09 pm »
the transformer thing.( study lamp)
they asked u to find the primary current.

ilovevce

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 74
Re: Suggested Solutions (VCAA Physics Unit 4 2008)
« Reply #36 on: November 12, 2008, 06:42:08 pm »
Is it necessary to have the dotted line below the x-axis for the graph? I thought only the experimental values were meant to be graphed, not extrapolations. On one of the assessment reports it stresses not to extrapolate the solid line. I was tossing up between drawing a dotted line or no line. In the end I thought it would be safer to have no dotted line.
MHS 2008
Japanese SL (2007): 41 > 48.58    English: 50   Chem: 47 > 48.88    Physics: 49 > 49.58   Methods: 47 > 48.91   French: 45 > 52.06
ENTER: 99.95 :D

Tutoring in English, MM, Chem, Physics
Places available for Unit 4

ilovevce

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 74
Re: Suggested Solutions (VCAA Physics Unit 4 2008)
« Reply #37 on: November 12, 2008, 06:48:05 pm »
Question 1 2 marks
the key word here was "through the coil".... I wonder what they want... 5 lines towards the right, or 5 rings [because last year there was something in the ass report on this]. Go with your own interpretations.

Eek! They won't take marks away for drawing rings, surely? After all, part of the rings do go THROUGH the coil. I went to lots of effort annotating the rings to show their correct orientation, so it was obvious the lines come out of the page and to the right inside the coil.
MHS 2008
Japanese SL (2007): 41 > 48.58    English: 50   Chem: 47 > 48.88    Physics: 49 > 49.58   Methods: 47 > 48.91   French: 45 > 52.06
ENTER: 99.95 :D

Tutoring in English, MM, Chem, Physics
Places available for Unit 4

onlyfknhuman

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 372
Re: Suggested Solutions (VCAA Physics Unit 4 2008)
« Reply #38 on: November 12, 2008, 06:49:59 pm »
huh anyone rmb the unit for plank's constant? i was like wtf

hahahha me too i totally forgot THEN I LOOKED ON THE DATA SHEET AND THERE IT WAS
English - VCD - Methods - Physics - Chemistry - Art - Japanese

give me the name list of all the hot chicks u know  ;)

pinchies

  • Victorian
  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 43
Re: Suggested Solutions (VCAA Physics Unit 4 2008)
« Reply #39 on: November 12, 2008, 06:50:32 pm »
Whoo-Hoo! Full multi!! (except debate over last one)
2007: Soft Dev 46 ~ 2008: Eng (30+) , Chem(37+), Physics(45+), Methods (42+), Spec (35+ stupid exam 1...) ~ MHS 2008 - here we go! Enter dream aim: 97+, but realistic 95+

onlyfknhuman

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 372
Re: Suggested Solutions (VCAA Physics Unit 4 2008)
« Reply #40 on: November 12, 2008, 06:52:11 pm »
fck bro, last 2 questions were absolute a holes

for 12, i was juggingling betwen B and C, and i chose C  mao chose B -.-
for 13 i was juggling between B and C again, and i chose C. lol...

and i screwed up that q to p shit, fk i dont know wtf happened there im sure it was p to q

4 marks is alot, if i got the lenz law explanation right.. do i still get marks regardless of teh directiion i put?
English - VCD - Methods - Physics - Chemistry - Art - Japanese

give me the name list of all the hot chicks u know  ;)

xers

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 94
Re: Suggested Solutions (VCAA Physics Unit 4 2008)
« Reply #41 on: November 12, 2008, 07:00:55 pm »
fck bro, last 2 questions were absolute a holes

for 12, i was juggingling betwen B and C, and i chose C  mao chose B -.-
for 13 i was juggling between B and C again, and i chose C. lol...

and i screwed up that q to p shit, fk i dont know wtf happened there im sure it was p to q

4 marks is alot, if i got the lenz law explanation right.. do i still get marks regardless of teh directiion i put?

Me too, i was pretty sure it was p to q, and my reasoning was exactly the same as Mao's too, don't know where i went wrong.

jamestaR`

  • Victorian
  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 30
Re: Suggested Solutions (VCAA Physics Unit 4 2008)
« Reply #42 on: November 12, 2008, 07:04:42 pm »
Zomg, it was the current through the SQUARE it even had it in bold

pinchies

  • Victorian
  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 43
Re: Suggested Solutions (VCAA Physics Unit 4 2008)
« Reply #43 on: November 12, 2008, 07:05:05 pm »
I thought the last one was C, becuase it included the destructive interference resulting in cancellation of sound and therefore apparent distortion. The bit about "different freqs reflect differently" is just saying that theres a lot of freqs hitting the wall and bouncing back to superimpose...

but i could be wrong

C - Without the curtains, different frequencies will reflect differently from the walls, causing distortion due to interference effects.

D - Without the curtains, there would be multiple paths from the speaker to each member of the audience, thus causing distortion and sound loss due to interference effects in some parts of the theatre.

that's the only thing I didn't like about C.
that and, D is more "complete" in saying that there will be distortion as well as sound loss, but only in some parts

anyhow, I could be entirely wrong about different frequencies all reflecting the same...


Fidgey: it does say "smallest wavelength". sorry buddy.

Low frequencies will reverberate off walls, refracting differently, not as sharply as the high frequencies. The curtains will absorb higher frequencies, and will diminish reverb in the hall. This reverb could be considered to be distortion if it occurs as a slap-back echo (particularly with flat walls), and may cause a 'muddying' of the sound.
Reverb must be carefully controlled as not enough will make the sound very 'dry', so this question really needs an expert. I tried talking to my dad, who (many-many years ago, mind you) ran his own sound studio, and even he was not able to decide between them. :-/
2007: Soft Dev 46 ~ 2008: Eng (30+) , Chem(37+), Physics(45+), Methods (42+), Spec (35+ stupid exam 1...) ~ MHS 2008 - here we go! Enter dream aim: 97+, but realistic 95+

Mao

  • CH41RMN
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 9181
  • School: Kambrya College
  • School Grad Year: 2008
Re: Suggested Solutions (VCAA Physics Unit 4 2008)
« Reply #44 on: November 12, 2008, 07:19:13 pm »
^^ that was full of wisdom I cannot comprehend :P

ahhhhh
Editor for ATARNotes Chemistry study guides.

VCE 2008 | Monash BSc (Chem., Appl. Math.) 2009-2011 | UoM BScHon (Chem.) 2012 | UoM PhD (Chem.) 2013-2015