Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

May 21, 2024, 06:26:40 am

Author Topic: On the political process  (Read 872 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

brendan

  • Guest
On the political process
« on: February 18, 2008, 12:13:13 pm »
0
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/17/business/17view.html?_r=1&oref=slogin

Tyler Cowen is a professor of economics at George Mason University.

"The reality is that democracy is a very blunt instrument, and in today’s environment we are choosing between ways of muddling through. We may hear that the election is about different visions for America’s future, but the pitches may be more akin to selling different brands of soap.

We hear so many superficial messages precisely because most American voters have neither the knowledge nor the commitment to evaluate the pronouncements of politicians on economic issues. It is no accident that the most influential political science book of the last year has been “The Myth of the Rational Voter,” by Bryan Caplan. The book shows that many voters are ill-informed or even irrational; many economic issues are complex, and each voter knows that he or she will not determine the final outcome.

Rather than being cynics, we should be realists. Democracy is reasonably good at some things: pushing scoundrels out of office, checking their worst excesses by requiring openness, and simply giving large numbers of people the feeling of having a voice. Democracy is not nearly as good at others: holding politicians accountable for their economic promises or translating the preferences of intellectuals into public policy.

THAT might sound pessimistic, but it’s not. Many Americans will be living longer, finding new sources of learning and recreation, creating more rewarding jobs, striking up new loves and friendships, and, yes, earning more money. Just don’t expect most of these gains to come out of the voting booth or, for that matter, Washington."

Thomas Sowell, Economic Facts and Fallacies, p. 31-32:

"What is called "planning" in political rhetoric is the government's suppression of other people's plans by superimposing on them a collective plan, created by third parties, armed with the power of government and exempted from paying the costs that these collective plans impose on others."
« Last Edit: February 18, 2008, 12:32:04 pm by Brendan »