Yes I agree. But that's part of integration policy, educating the populace to be more tolerant and welcoming of newcomers. I've seen so many 2nd generation+ Aussies go up to immigrants who speak poor English and say 'LEARN OUR LANGUAGE!!11 OR GET OUT!!11' as if they think the poor people would pass up the chance to learn to speak good English if they could. It's that kind of stupid bullshit that makes my stomach turn. Because they feel alienated, their kids grow up in an insular environment and things get fuckered up. That's how you get the degradation of migrant communities. It just makes you want to hit your head against a wall several times, it's that frustrating.
Shit needs changing here.
exactly. The migrants cannot integrate because they have no contact environments to integrate into. they cannot learn the language properly because in they are forced into their secular communities by arrogance and ignorance of the general public.
few migrants have the chance to integrate properly, and it took a darn lot of effort and even distancing oneself from their original culture [i was such a case].
and the racism is ongoing, even teachers recieve constant racist remarks from their students and respective parents, and that absolutely disgust me [my English teacher gets abused often for being Indian, even though he is very abled and probably teach a lot better than most teachers at my school]
Costa's behaviour is a typical case of where the teaching of equality, tolerance and acceptance of multiculturalism has failed. even though he himself came from a migrant family, it doesnt seem he has taken it on board how much this opportunity means to people
immigration may have an adverse impact on welfare, but we are talking about opportunities and freedom: by the same argument, we are talking about lives here, what makes one person more deserving than another?
Whilst is it nice to hope that a nation can clear the poverty line entirely [whenever that is], why should that be done at opportunities of education and employment for unskilled migrants? this arrogance is presented by the same population against "elitism" (see recent arguments on select-entry schools), yet the very elitist scheme is being presented here: "we will look after ourselves so we can be better off, and then we'll worry about the rest later when we feel like"
anyone care to say "hypocrisy"?