Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

September 20, 2025, 06:25:50 pm

Author Topic: TrueTears question thread  (Read 66216 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

/0

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 4124
  • Respect: +45
Re: TrueTears question thread
« Reply #60 on: December 30, 2008, 04:55:59 pm »
0
ah thanks.

also, show that the parabola with equation has no points of inflexion.





Assuming , , so the graph will always be either concave up or concave down.

humph

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1437
  • Respect: +16
Re: TrueTears question thread
« Reply #61 on: December 30, 2008, 09:28:44 pm »
0
ah thanks.

also,

1. show that the parabola with equation has no points of inflexion.

2. Determine the points of inflexion for the following function:







so point of inflexion occurs when . But this is not a point of inflexion, why is that?
If is a point of inflection of , then . Unfortunately, the converse is not true: does not necessarily imply that is a point of inflection of . That is, is necessary but not sufficient for to be a point of inflection of .
VCE 2006
PhB (Hons) (Sc), ANU, 2007-2010
MPhil, ANU, 2011-2012
PhD, Princeton, 2012-2017
Research Associate, University College London, 2017-2020
Assistant Professor, University of Virginia, 2020-

Feel free to ask me about (advanced) mathematics.

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: TrueTears question thread
« Reply #62 on: December 30, 2008, 10:07:18 pm »
0
ah i see, so what are the conditions for point of inflexion?

And also this question:

The equation of a curve C is , where is a constant

a) find

C does have a tangent parallel to the y axis

b) show that the y coordinate at the point of contact satisfies

how do u do part b)?

many thanks
« Last Edit: December 31, 2008, 01:19:14 am by TrueTears »
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

humph

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1437
  • Respect: +16
Re: TrueTears question thread
« Reply #63 on: December 31, 2008, 01:45:05 am »
0
ah i see, so what are the conditions for point of inflexion?
I think it involves calculating at points near and either side of the point you're interested in. Can't remember the exact details though, but it should be in a textbook.

And also this question:

The equation of a curve C is , where is a constant

a) find

C does have a tangent parallel to the y axis

b) show that the y coordinate at the point of contact satisfies

how do u do part b)?

many thanks
" does have a tangent parallel to the -axis" means that the gradient is infinite at this point (this is quite dodgy mathematically but hopefully you understand what I mean geometrically - a straight vertical line is kinda like a linear function with infinite gradient).
Anyway, this will obviously happen when the denominator of is equal to zero. You found this to be , so we have that .
So what we have is that when the tangent of the curve is parallel to the -axis, and so the gradient is "infinite", we must have that the point at which this occurs must satisfy the relation . In particular, we can substitute this value of into the equation of the curve (as this point lies on the curve) in order to find that .
VCE 2006
PhB (Hons) (Sc), ANU, 2007-2010
MPhil, ANU, 2011-2012
PhD, Princeton, 2012-2017
Research Associate, University College London, 2017-2020
Assistant Professor, University of Virginia, 2020-

Feel free to ask me about (advanced) mathematics.

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: TrueTears question thread
« Reply #64 on: December 31, 2008, 01:50:17 am »
0
ah yessss thanks so much , that was wat i was confused about, coz a vertically has undefined gradient lol
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: TrueTears question thread
« Reply #65 on: December 31, 2008, 02:47:39 pm »
0
yeah and just back to the point of inflexion stuff, my book says "A point of inflexion will occur at if , and and have different signs."

So to work out the points of inflexion for for







so ... and ... So there will be a point of inflexion at since both signs are different.

But this is where i don't get, if you do the same to you get:

... and ... So both signs are different, so there should be a point of inflexion at . However my book's answers says there isn't. The same goes for . Can someone clarify this?
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

Matt The Rat

  • Guest
Re: TrueTears question thread
« Reply #66 on: December 31, 2008, 03:10:02 pm »
0
For Spec, I don't think you need to be too worried expect about points of inflexion. Just remember and you should be right. If not, blame Coblin; it's what he told me. But the way the book describes it is correct.

/0

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 4124
  • Respect: +45
Re: TrueTears question thread
« Reply #67 on: December 31, 2008, 04:36:32 pm »
0
I think should all be points of inflection. An easy way to visualise it is as if you are driving a car on the curve. Every time you are not 'turning' left or right, but driving straight (momentarily) you will get a point of inflection.

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: TrueTears question thread
« Reply #68 on: December 31, 2008, 06:42:01 pm »
0
I think should all be points of inflection. An easy way to visualise it is as if you are driving a car on the curve. Every time you are not 'turning' left or right, but driving straight (momentarily) you will get a point of inflection.

ah, kk so i guess the book's answer is wrong o.o

And also some other questions

1. Consider  , does not equal 0

If x > 0, find .

My book does . How do u get the ?

2. . Show that for all

3. Co-ordinate Z is described by and , find the locus of Z as varies.

Many thanks again, i really appreciate all your helps XD
« Last Edit: December 31, 2008, 10:58:03 pm by TrueTears »
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

/0

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 4124
  • Respect: +45
Re: TrueTears question thread
« Reply #69 on: January 01, 2009, 02:29:51 am »
0
1.
The derivative of the entire expression is 0, so the graph is constant.



Alternatively, derive from a triangle... or use the fact that to deduce that .

2.





If the graph has non-negative gradient, then:



Since is the product of two numbers, and since is always greater than 0, it follows that .

So the graph is rising for .

When ,

The gradient of the graph is negative for , but the lowest point is A = 0, from which point it starts rising. (for all p in R)

3.

,




« Last Edit: January 01, 2009, 02:33:35 am by /0 »

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: TrueTears question thread
« Reply #70 on: January 01, 2009, 08:46:45 pm »
0
hm i get Q 2 and Q 3, but still cloudy on Q 1 o.O

and also just this Q

Find an anti derivative to
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

ell

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 801
  • Respect: +18
Re: TrueTears question thread
« Reply #71 on: January 01, 2009, 09:34:54 pm »
0
hm i get Q 2 and Q 3, but still cloudy on Q 1 o.O

and also just this Q

Find an anti derivative to










TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: TrueTears question thread
« Reply #72 on: January 02, 2009, 03:02:05 pm »
0
thanks ell,

also

1. just a bit stuck lol

2. i did this question, but my answer looks totally different from book, wondering if someone can confirm if it is right or not.

so =



let















sub back in and we get

However answer in my book has

Is that a different form, or is my answer wrong?
« Last Edit: January 02, 2009, 03:24:05 pm by TrueTears »
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

ed_saifa

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 911
  • Respect: +5
Re: TrueTears question thread
« Reply #73 on: January 02, 2009, 04:58:54 pm »
0




Let

Rearranging gives





=
 

=

=

=

=

For question 2 you are correct.
« Last Edit: January 02, 2009, 05:00:41 pm by ed_saifa »
[IMG]http://img411.imageshack.us/img411/2506/avatarcg3.png[/img]
(\ /)
(0.o)
(><)
/_|_\

"It's not a community effort"
"It's not allowed. Only death is a valid excuse"
"Probably for the first time time this year I was totally flabbergasted by some of the 'absolute junk' I had to correct .... I was going to use 'crap' but that was too kind a word"
"How can you expect to do well when
-you draw a lemon as having two half-cells connected with a salt bridge
-your lemons come with Cu2+ ions built in" - Dwyer
"Why'd you score so bad?!" - Zotos
"Your arguments are seri

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: TrueTears question thread
« Reply #74 on: January 02, 2009, 05:03:54 pm »
0
ahhh thank you very much ed_saifa
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.