Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

October 17, 2025, 06:02:36 am

Author Topic: TrueTears question thread  (Read 68068 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: TrueTears question thread
« Reply #450 on: July 28, 2009, 11:06:58 pm »
0
Ahhh ok, thanks Mao!
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: TrueTears question thread
« Reply #451 on: July 29, 2009, 03:54:03 pm »
0
How to change into cubic "turning point" form, ie ?

Thanks!
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

dcc

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1198
  • Respect: +55
  • School Grad Year: 2008
Re: TrueTears question thread
« Reply #452 on: July 29, 2009, 04:12:20 pm »
0
Such a form doesn't necessarily exist, however for this 'special case' you can do:
, where in the above example.

EDIT:

And I must add, I don't really see a purpose to this form for a cubic.  Only a subset of the cubics can be expressed in such a way, and it doesn't tell you much about anything at all (quite unlike the turning point form for a parabola, where you can immediately recognise the minimum value of the function and where it occurs).


« Last Edit: July 29, 2009, 09:51:24 pm by dcc »

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: TrueTears question thread
« Reply #453 on: July 30, 2009, 07:05:49 pm »
0
thanks dcc
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: TrueTears question thread
« Reply #454 on: August 01, 2009, 07:15:20 pm »
0
Just this question from an exam... I think answer is wrong can anyone show me what they get when they do this question?

Shade the required region of:

n n

Many thanks!
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

Damo17

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 855
  • Respect: +8
Re: TrueTears question thread
« Reply #455 on: August 01, 2009, 07:38:44 pm »
0
Just this question from an exam... I think answer is wrong can anyone show me what they get when they do this question?

Shade the required region of:

n n

Many thanks!


Haven't done these questions in a long time. I think it is the shaded area between all 3 graphs in the 4th quadrant.





The circle and the line with steep gradient are meant to be dotted.

« Last Edit: August 01, 2009, 08:27:13 pm by Damo17 »
2011: Science - ANU

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: TrueTears question thread
« Reply #456 on: August 01, 2009, 08:24:33 pm »
0
Yeah I got that as well, ok thanks Damo! Now I know the answers are wrong :)
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: TrueTears question thread
« Reply #457 on: August 02, 2009, 02:52:54 pm »
0
I did this question but I dono if my method is acceptable... anyways how would you guys attempt this question?

PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

kamil9876

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1943
  • Respect: +109
Re: TrueTears question thread
« Reply #458 on: August 02, 2009, 03:15:17 pm »
0
(1) so use chain rule after finding from implicit differentiation.

(2) After implicitly differentiating and finding , notice the equation . Use the identity:

and reciprocalise etc.

method 2 only worked because it's a linear function, more complicated ones work better with the chain rule (method 1)
Voltaire: "There is an astonishing imagination even in the science of mathematics ... We repeat, there is far more imagination in the head of Archimedes than in that of Homer."

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: TrueTears question thread
« Reply #459 on: August 02, 2009, 04:42:03 pm »
0
(1) so use chain rule after finding from implicit differentiation.

(2) After implicitly differentiating and finding , notice the equation . Use the identity:

and reciprocalise etc.

method 2 only worked because it's a linear function, more complicated ones work better with the chain rule (method 1)
True but that's not using "implicit differentiating" is it?

when you work out from the , that is not implicit differentiation, that is just differentiating with respect to x.
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

kamil9876

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1943
  • Respect: +109
Re: TrueTears question thread
« Reply #460 on: August 02, 2009, 04:50:06 pm »
0
"Normal Differentiation" is a subset of implicit differentiation :P. Differentiating both sides by x is implicit differentiation in this case, after all you have to use the chain rule for both sides and all that shiz that normally comes with implicit diff.

But yes, if you were to rearrange first then it woudl be 'regular' differentiation lol.




« Last Edit: August 02, 2009, 05:05:57 pm by kamil9876 »
Voltaire: "There is an astonishing imagination even in the science of mathematics ... We repeat, there is far more imagination in the head of Archimedes than in that of Homer."

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: TrueTears question thread
« Reply #461 on: August 02, 2009, 05:13:16 pm »
0
Thanks kamil!
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: TrueTears question thread
« Reply #462 on: August 02, 2009, 05:21:12 pm »
0
How about this innocent looking question but somewhere I get wrong answer...

Solve the differential equation given that when x = 0 y = -1
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

kamil9876

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1943
  • Respect: +109
Re: TrueTears question thread
« Reply #463 on: August 02, 2009, 05:27:40 pm »
0



Here's a fun way of getting rid of the modulus sign:






You probably forgot the modulus and thought that the function is +y inside the argument but really it has a - as shown by the negative A value.
Voltaire: "There is an astonishing imagination even in the science of mathematics ... We repeat, there is far more imagination in the head of Archimedes than in that of Homer."

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: TrueTears question thread
« Reply #464 on: August 02, 2009, 05:40:19 pm »
0
lol true true thanks!
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.