Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

September 24, 2025, 06:24:00 am

Author Topic: TrueTears question thread  (Read 66309 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

dejan91

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 824
  • Without risk, there is no adventure.
  • Respect: +7
Re: TrueTears question thread
« Reply #570 on: October 09, 2009, 03:18:11 pm »
0
What's the systematic way of working out


This requires the use of the trig identity:


What identity is this? Is it derived from something (as in manipulated) or are we meant to know it?
When I get sad, I stop being sad, and be AWESOME instead. True story.

TonyHem

  • Guest
Re: TrueTears question thread
« Reply #571 on: October 09, 2009, 03:33:53 pm »
0
What identity is this? Is it derived from something (as in manipulated) or are we meant to know it?






« Last Edit: October 09, 2009, 03:36:55 pm by TonyHem »

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: TrueTears question thread
« Reply #572 on: October 09, 2009, 04:20:58 pm »
0
What's the systematic way of working out


This requires the use of the trig identity:














But we take the negative as is negative, so:



Awesome, thanks, how did you think of ?
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

TonyHem

  • Guest
Re: TrueTears question thread
« Reply #573 on: October 09, 2009, 04:23:09 pm »
0
tan^2(theta) = 3 - 4sqrt{3} + 4

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: TrueTears question thread
« Reply #574 on: October 09, 2009, 04:26:30 pm »
0
tan^2(theta) = 3 - 4sqrt{3} + 4
indeed, thanks.

and yeah thanks again Damo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! pr0!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

Damo17

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 855
  • Respect: +8
Re: TrueTears question thread
« Reply #575 on: October 09, 2009, 04:38:29 pm »
0
and yeah thanks again Damo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! pr0!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

No problem. It took me a while, but I rather enjoyed it.
2011: Science - ANU

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: TrueTears question thread
« Reply #576 on: October 23, 2009, 04:48:38 pm »
0
A small object is dropped vertically down from the top of a building which is h metres high. It takes 0.4 seconds to travel the last 8 metres before it hits the ground. If the air resistance is negligible, show that the height of the building is :

Pretty simple question IF you assume it starts from rest. So can you assume it starts from rest?
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

kurrymuncher

  • Guest
Re: TrueTears question thread
« Reply #577 on: October 23, 2009, 04:56:18 pm »
0
A small object is dropped vertically down from the top of a building which is h metres high. It takes 0.4 seconds to travel the last 8 metres before it hits the ground. If the air resistance is negligible, show that the height of the building is :

Pretty simple question IF you assume it starts from rest. So can you assume it starts from rest?

Well, it says "dropped", so Im assuming it starts from rest.

maybe? i dont know lol

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: TrueTears question thread
« Reply #578 on: October 23, 2009, 04:57:48 pm »
0
A small object is dropped vertically down from the top of a building which is h metres high. It takes 0.4 seconds to travel the last 8 metres before it hits the ground. If the air resistance is negligible, show that the height of the building is :

Pretty simple question IF you assume it starts from rest. So can you assume it starts from rest?

Well, it says "dropped", so Im assuming it starts from rest.

maybe? i dont know lol
Yeah, but when something is dropped it would also be dropped with a certain velocity.
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

ed_saifa

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 911
  • Respect: +5
Re: TrueTears question thread
« Reply #579 on: October 23, 2009, 05:06:49 pm »
0
I'm sure that drop implies from rest. You can't really drop something with a certain velocity; that would be called thrown :P
[IMG]http://img411.imageshack.us/img411/2506/avatarcg3.png[/img]
(\ /)
(0.o)
(><)
/_|_\

"It's not a community effort"
"It's not allowed. Only death is a valid excuse"
"Probably for the first time time this year I was totally flabbergasted by some of the 'absolute junk' I had to correct .... I was going to use 'crap' but that was too kind a word"
"How can you expect to do well when
-you draw a lemon as having two half-cells connected with a salt bridge
-your lemons come with Cu2+ ions built in" - Dwyer
"Why'd you score so bad?!" - Zotos
"Your arguments are seri

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: TrueTears question thread
« Reply #580 on: October 23, 2009, 05:14:12 pm »
0
Ahhh haha, alright thanks you guys!
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: TrueTears question thread
« Reply #581 on: October 23, 2009, 05:58:42 pm »
0
A particle is moving so that its position at time t seconds is given by . Find the cartesian equation of the particle, state the domain and range.

Let and

So the cartesian equation is .

So I've always done that the range of = domain of cartesian and range of = range of cartesian.

Okay, so the range of for is which is right domain for cartesian, however range of is however the cartesian is not defined for does that mean we take the highest possible range that is defined for the cartesian? ie,
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

kamil9876

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1943
  • Respect: +109
Re: TrueTears question thread
« Reply #582 on: October 23, 2009, 06:17:17 pm »
0
The crux is in this step:



when "inverting":
and that other scenario that I cbf working out.

THis is analogous to not being neccesary.
Voltaire: "There is an astonishing imagination even in the science of mathematics ... We repeat, there is far more imagination in the head of Archimedes than in that of Homer."

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: TrueTears question thread
« Reply #583 on: October 23, 2009, 06:19:38 pm »
0
Okay, so the range of for is which is right domain for cartesian, however range of is however the cartesian is not defined for does that mean we take the highest possible range that is defined for the cartesian? ie,
So... what range do I take?
« Last Edit: October 23, 2009, 06:21:45 pm by TrueTears »
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

Mao

  • CH41RMN
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 9181
  • Respect: +390
  • School: Kambrya College
  • School Grad Year: 2008
Re: TrueTears question thread
« Reply #584 on: October 23, 2009, 06:25:17 pm »
0
the cartesian equation is not necessarily a function

The cartesian equation is

Domain is [-2,2], range is [0,infinity)

The graph is a wave travelling vertically upwards.
Editor for ATARNotes Chemistry study guides.

VCE 2008 | Monash BSc (Chem., Appl. Math.) 2009-2011 | UoM BScHon (Chem.) 2012 | UoM PhD (Chem.) 2013-2015