Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

November 17, 2025, 09:49:17 am

Author Topic: TrueTears question thread  (Read 93435 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: TrueTears question thread
« Reply #150 on: June 17, 2009, 07:08:19 pm »
0
Magnetism is so fun :)
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: TrueTears question thread
« Reply #151 on: June 17, 2009, 07:40:08 pm »
0
Another question: see attached.



How do you work out the the direction of the change in magnetic flux? (In this case upwards)

And when it says "the induced magnetic field will then be down at this point" At what "point" is it down? How do you work out the direction of the current?

Thanks!
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

Mao

  • CH41RMN
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 9181
  • Respect: +390
  • School: Kambrya College
  • School Grad Year: 2008
Re: TrueTears question thread
« Reply #152 on: June 17, 2009, 07:57:48 pm »
0
Lenz's law: the direction of magnetic field generated by the induced current is in the opposite direction to the direction of change in flux.

i.e. for the above case figure a
in that position, as it rotates flux to the right decreases
hence the direction of magnetic field generated by the induced current points to the right [since it is a coil, treat it as a solenoid].
by the right hand rule, current flows from A to B.
Editor for ATARNotes Chemistry study guides.

VCE 2008 | Monash BSc (Chem., Appl. Math.) 2009-2011 | UoM BScHon (Chem.) 2012 | UoM PhD (Chem.) 2013-2015

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: TrueTears question thread
« Reply #153 on: June 17, 2009, 08:07:31 pm »
0
Ah cool thanks!

Also when it says in part (a) the magnetic flux is entering the loop from above and in part (b) it enters from below. What does "entering from above" and "entering from below" mean?
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

Mao

  • CH41RMN
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 9181
  • Respect: +390
  • School: Kambrya College
  • School Grad Year: 2008
Re: TrueTears question thread
« Reply #154 on: June 17, 2009, 08:12:01 pm »
0
Ah cool thanks!

Also when it says in part (a) the magnetic flux is entering the loop from above and in part (b) it enters from below. What does "entering from above" and "entering from below" mean?

it means a weird explanations that you should pay no attention to :)

always consider it as a change in flux.

in part b, as the coil rotates there is a net increase in flux to the right, hence by lenz's law, the induced current will have a magnetic field opposing this, i.e. to the left.
by the right hand screw rule, current flows from C to D.
Editor for ATARNotes Chemistry study guides.

VCE 2008 | Monash BSc (Chem., Appl. Math.) 2009-2011 | UoM BScHon (Chem.) 2012 | UoM PhD (Chem.) 2013-2015

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: TrueTears question thread
« Reply #155 on: June 17, 2009, 08:41:30 pm »
0
Thanks Mao, I get it now XD
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: TrueTears question thread
« Reply #156 on: June 19, 2009, 01:29:42 am »
0
How much charge, in coulombs, flows in a loop of wire of area and resistance 0.2 ohms when it is totally withdrawn from a magnetic field of strength 3.0 T?

Thanks.
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

Mao

  • CH41RMN
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 9181
  • Respect: +390
  • School: Kambrya College
  • School Grad Year: 2008
Re: TrueTears question thread
« Reply #157 on: June 19, 2009, 11:53:55 am »
0
Faraday's Law:













:)
Editor for ATARNotes Chemistry study guides.

VCE 2008 | Monash BSc (Chem., Appl. Math.) 2009-2011 | UoM BScHon (Chem.) 2012 | UoM PhD (Chem.) 2013-2015

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: TrueTears question thread
« Reply #158 on: June 19, 2009, 01:27:33 pm »
0
Thanks Mao.

Yeap, that's what I did and I got = 24000 C. But book says 0.0024 C :S. Wrong?
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

cns1511

  • Guest
Re: TrueTears question thread
« Reply #159 on: June 19, 2009, 06:17:51 pm »
0
I have a feeling it should be 1.6*10^{-3} m^2 :)

-Mao

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: TrueTears question thread
« Reply #160 on: June 19, 2009, 06:22:43 pm »
0
Heh, yeap that works out to be the right answer :P

stupid shittycaranda XD
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: TrueTears question thread
« Reply #161 on: June 20, 2009, 02:10:26 pm »
0
Just out of interest, when an electromagnet is formed normally it would be iron and you would put copper wires around it with a current flowing through it, some of the electron domains in the iron would line up with the magnetic field hence become an electromagnet. But why can't all metals become electromagnets? (Or not work as well as iron). Don't all metals have electrons?

Thanks.
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

NE2000

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1221
  • living an alternate reality
  • Respect: +4
Re: TrueTears question thread
« Reply #162 on: June 20, 2009, 04:10:22 pm »
0
Just out of interest, when an electromagnet is formed normally it would be iron and you would put copper wires around it with a current flowing through it, some of the electron domains in the iron would line up with the magnetic field hence become an electromagnet. But why can't all metals become electromagnets? (Or not work as well as iron). Don't all metals have electrons?

Thanks.

I think it something to do with iron, nickel and cobalt having electrons that tend to align in the same direction. All metals have electrons, all electrons spin and all spinning electrons generate magnetic fields. In the case of many metals these magnetic fields cancel out very well so the metals don't have the ability to be turned into electromagnets. In the case of these three metals nearby on the periodic table the magnetic field seems to add together in these domains which allows them to be permanently or temporarily magnetised. It's something like that anyway.
2009: English, Specialist Math, Mathematical Methods, Chemistry, Physics

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: TrueTears question thread
« Reply #163 on: June 20, 2009, 04:15:01 pm »
0
Ah cool I think I get the gist of it :)
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: TrueTears question thread
« Reply #164 on: June 20, 2009, 09:03:28 pm »
0
Also, split rings are used in motors and slip rings are used in generators. What are the differences between the 2? (besides the fact one is used only for DC motors the other is used in generators) What are the functions of each? How do they exactly work?

Many thanks!

EDIT: Okay, I think I know what they do now, can anyone check if my understanding of these 2 devices are correct?

1. Split rings
Split rings are used in DC motors. They are connected to the coils so they can spin with them. Their purpose is to connect to the opposite terminal, so if one half of the split ring was connected to the -ve terminal and the other half was connected to the +ve then each time the coil is rotated into 90 degree position (ie, when it's vertical), the 2 halfs of the split ring would now be connected to its opposite terminals. As a result the current is now reversed so the net torque is still in its original direction (If it was clockwise, it would continue to be clockwise) hence the coil would still rotate in its original direction.

2. Slip rings
Slip rings are used in generators. They act like "terminals" of a battery. During a period of time when the coil is being rotated, one slip ring (let's call this P) would act as the +ve terminal and the other slip ring (let's call it Q) would act as the -ve terminal. Then as the coil continues to rotate, P would act as the -ve terminal and Q would act as the +ve terminal. What kind of terminal the 2 slip rings would act can easily be determined using Lenz Law and finding the direction of current flow (a diagram would be much easier to explain this). This means the current is reversed after a certain period of time hence it also explains why generators only produce AC current (due to the reversal of current).

Thanks :)
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.