Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

September 03, 2025, 08:17:08 am

Author Topic: Socceroos V Uzbekistan  (Read 4424 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

mypurpleundercracka

  • Guest
Re: Socceroos V Uzbekistan
« Reply #15 on: April 01, 2009, 10:05:12 pm »
0
2-nil to aus, looks like where off to seth efrika next year!!!

message to uzbekistan:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b2i5ShKaASc

costargh

  • Guest
Re: Socceroos V Uzbekistan
« Reply #16 on: April 01, 2009, 10:07:12 pm »
0
Costargh's post-game analysis:

Not entirely convincing by Australia.
2nd half was better than first.
Subbing Keneddy on changed the game.
Australia still lacks a real potent striker.
Other areas of the park are solid but penetration of final third still needs work (although having Cahill on would definetly have helped)
Penalty was sus

mypurpleundercracka

  • Guest
Re: Socceroos V Uzbekistan
« Reply #17 on: April 01, 2009, 10:33:34 pm »
0
ah yeah well Jesus came on and with the help of divine intervention he scored, mcdonald was disappointing but he will make up for his dismal performance by baggin a few on the weekend in the SPL

costargh

  • Guest
Re: Socceroos V Uzbekistan
« Reply #18 on: April 01, 2009, 11:00:09 pm »
0
I don't think I can actually say MdDonald was disapointing.

He was destined to fail with the system we played with. Cmon, lone striker... midget? Not particularly fast?
If we played him right he'd be firing them home/

mypurpleundercracka

  • Guest
Re: Socceroos V Uzbekistan
« Reply #19 on: April 01, 2009, 11:07:11 pm »
0
I don't think I can actually say MdDonald was disapointing.

He was destined to fail with the system we played with. Cmon, lone striker... midget? Not particularly fast?
If we played him right he'd be firing them home/

macca's used to playing with tall partners such as van hesselink and georgios samaras, perhaps kennedy should have played alongside him

Noblesse

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1263
  • Respect: +10
Re: Socceroos V Uzbekistan
« Reply #20 on: April 01, 2009, 11:08:34 pm »
0
So is this volleyball or what?

costargh

  • Guest
Re: Socceroos V Uzbekistan
« Reply #21 on: April 01, 2009, 11:10:50 pm »
0
I don't think I can actually say MdDonald was disapointing.

He was destined to fail with the system we played with. Cmon, lone striker... midget? Not particularly fast?
If we played him right he'd be firing them home/

macca's used to playing with tall partners such as van hesselink and georgios samaras, perhaps kennedy should have played alongside him

Agreed.

mypurpleundercracka

  • Guest
Re: Socceroos V Uzbekistan
« Reply #22 on: April 01, 2009, 11:12:10 pm »
0
So is this volleyball or what?

football

/0

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 4124
  • Respect: +45
Re: Socceroos V Uzbekistan
« Reply #23 on: April 02, 2009, 11:36:27 am »
0
Lol my chem teacher wants Harry Kewell to come to our school so he can sign his shirt

mypurpleundercracka

  • Guest
Re: Socceroos V Uzbekistan
« Reply #24 on: April 02, 2009, 03:42:55 pm »
0
Lol my chem teacher wants Harry Kewell to come to our school so he can sign his shirt

lol why kewell he is mediocre nowadays, timmy cahill ftw

gfb

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 580
  • Respect: +1
Re: Socceroos V Uzbekistan
« Reply #25 on: April 02, 2009, 04:39:18 pm »
0
Lol my chem teacher wants Harry Kewell to come to our school so he can sign his shirt

LMAO. Your chem teacher is off his nuts. It won't happen mate. He's off to Istanbul xD.

mypurpleundercracka

  • Guest
Re: Socceroos V Uzbekistan
« Reply #26 on: April 02, 2009, 06:40:56 pm »
0
Lol my chem teacher wants Harry Kewell to come to our school so he can sign his shirt

LMAO. Your chem teacher is off his nuts. It won't happen mate. He's off to Istanbul xD.

his doin well at galatasaray