No it doesn't. I see no mention of any of the relevant texts anywhere in the article. (I also find it hard to believe you would know what the relevant texts are.)
But even if we are to assume that what's written there is correct, it's at most a legal technicality which is essentially meaningless.
At the end of the day:
A man cannot give a get without the consent of his wife.
A woman cannot give a get without the consent of her husband.
A man can start divorce proceedings against his wife.
A woman can start divorce proceedings against her husband.
I dunno, to me that seems fairly equal, but if you want to get your knickers in a twist over some exaggerated perceived sexism, go with it.
Nah, I'm not letting you weasel out of this one

It's interesting that you didn't rebut my point that Jewish men can just ASK for the document, but the woman must go through the degrading process of legal action in a court. Tell me how this isn't sexist? And finally, if it isn't sexist, tell me how this situation comes to pass:
http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/news/religious-courts-society-must-shun-divorce-deniers-1.255283Where even the religious community is SHUNNING taht man because he won't grant his wife a divorce, yet they can't act to grant the divorce themselves? Seems like your religion has sexism ingrained within it...
Also you're such a fucking weasel. All that is required in Jewish law for a woman's "consent" is that the man hand the document to his wife. He can do that for any reason. Once the document has been handed to her, the divorce is finalised. She doesn't need to sign for it, or "consent" to him. He just needs to physically press the document into her hand.
And you knew that, and like the wormy weasel that you are you tried to play it down. How disgraceful.