Anyone know much about this site? www.yourwork.com.au

[ProtonStar]

Lol, so now what?

[damo707]

[paulsterio]

I'll also add that we've helped to put a company out of business before by exposing them as frauds. We'll happily do it again.

which company was that? :O

if only you guys could drive medentry out of business as well! that would be quite nice

[ninwa]

We respectfully ask that you delete this post as publishing these accusations does constitute defamation.

no it doesn't

[paulsterio]

off topic, but JarrydIsBored, your subjects are gold, you've taken 11 different subjects!!

We respectfully ask that you delete this post as publishing these accusations does constitute defamation.

no it doesn't

SHUT DOWN!

[nacho]

My highly paid legal team internet lawyer degree tells me that it's not defamation

get the legal studies boys in here
oh wait I do legal studies.
What can I say.... I have no idea, despite the fact my exam is in two days

HOWEVER!
I do know that If you kill someone and satisy mens rea and actus reus - it is classified as murder

[ProtonStar]

off topic, but JarrydIsBored, your subjects are gold, you've taken 11 different subjects!!

People called me crazy, but I really wanted to try a range of subjects to see where my interests were Funnily enough, I prefer the Maths/Science subjects (which I took in Year 11) which is why I'm off to do a Bachelor of Science Thank god I didn't need methods or a science to get in! (Well if that was the case, I would have kept those subjects haha)

[yourwork]

Yes it does constitute defamation actually.
Defamation = 3 things

• Making a defamatory statement (certainly this has lowered Your Work's reputation)
• Made known to a third person (again you can track the views yourself)
• Caused damage (financial, physical, mental) to Your Work (remains to be seen but certainly on ATAR Notes it has.

[ninwa]

and now read up on the defences to defamation mr internet lawyer

[MJRomeo81]

Yes it does constitute defamation actually.
Defamation = 3 things

• Making a defamatory statement (certainly this has lowered Your Work's reputation)
• Made known to a third person (again you can track the views yourself)
• Caused damage (financial, physical, mental) to Your Work (remains to be seen but certainly on ATAR Notes it has.

Hahahahaha mate you think you're a lawyer because you do legal studies.

A statement can't be defamatory if it is of trivial nature. GTFO

[yourwork]

Best defence to defamation is that it was the truth - prove it...

I think you'll struggle

[yourwork]

Yes it does constitute defamation actually.
Defamation = 3 things

• Making a defamatory statement (certainly this has lowered Your Work's reputation)
• Made known to a third person (again you can track the views yourself)
• Caused damage (financial, physical, mental) to Your Work (remains to be seen but certainly on ATAR Notes it has.

Hahahahaha mate you think you're a lawyer because you do legal studies.

A statement can't be defamatory if it is of trivial nature. GTFO

That's where you're wrong. Look at the response this is getting. Proving that it's not trivial

[MJRomeo81]

Yes it does constitute defamation actually.
Defamation = 3 things

• Making a defamatory statement (certainly this has lowered Your Work's reputation)
• Made known to a third person (again you can track the views yourself)
• Caused damage (financial, physical, mental) to Your Work (remains to be seen but certainly on ATAR Notes it has.

Hahahahaha mate you think you're a lawyer because you do legal studies.

A statement can't be defamatory if it is of trivial nature. GTFO

That's where you're wrong. Look at the response this is getting. Proving that it's not trivial

Yeah bro. Because the court is going to waste its resources over something like this. You make me laugh.

[damo707]

Best defence to defamation is that it was the truth - prove it...

I think you'll struggle

Arguing with people on this forum really isn't helping your reputation. Kinda defaming yourself...

[yourwork]

You think we're really going to go to court? Please...

If you get back to the original post we stated that we would like this thread removed as it constitutes defamation. I think that's more than obvious