For the attached picture, is answer (1.) in the correct from or is answer (2.) correct?
Also, say a question asks for an coordinates to two decimal places. I solve f(x) = 0 to be x = 92.19890352042034 (because the exact value is too long to write down). Then I solve y = f(92.19890352042034). My question is, for the "method mark" do I have to write y = f(92.19890352042034) or can I write something similar to y = (92.198...) because writing all those numbers can waste time/make careless errors.
For the image, go for 1. While 2. is technically correct, you're meant to simplify things that can be easily simplied in methods. Wouldn't risk the mark when the answer is right there.
For the decimal places, it's pretty safe to write a 'less exact' number than what you're actually working with on your calculator. Generally if you're rounding to 2dp, your working should be reasonably accurate at 4dp. Just make sure on the calculator you use the full value.
A certain curve has its gradient given by \(4e^\frac{-x}{2}\). If the curve crosses the y-axis at y=4, where does it cross the x axis?
Using \(y=ax^2+bx+c\), I've found that c=4 but I'm unsure of where to go from there.
I think you're meant to integrate the gradient equation and solve for an exponential function to find the x-value. If the answer is \(x=2\ln
\left(\frac{2}{3}\right)\), I can share my working out.

Anyone know if its ok to use the matrices+ determinant method to solve for infinite, no, or 1 solution? So much quicker with less chance of error compared to the 'normal' ways. I learnt it in 1/2 but outta course
I'm also interested in knowing this.
