Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

September 27, 2025, 05:57:27 am

Author Topic: Teacher quality vs Studying  (Read 21168 times)  Share 

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

paulsterio

  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 4803
  • I <3 2SHAN
  • Respect: +430
Re: Teacher quality vs Studying
« Reply #45 on: December 22, 2011, 03:05:15 pm »
0
I think generally being unhelpful is a bad teacher, I have no problems with teachers who "don't know" and are happy to ask other teachers or find out for their students, at least they're making the effort. Teachers who give wrong information are just as bad, as well as teachers that are disorganised, I personally think if they are a teacher, they should at least put in the effort, that's what separates a bad teacher from an average teacher, just the effort they put in

Charmz

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 488
  • Respect: +16
  • School Grad Year: 2012
Re: Teacher quality vs Studying
« Reply #46 on: December 22, 2011, 03:12:35 pm »
+1
I don't mind teachers who don't know some things and find them out for you. But teachers who cover up suggesting you should teach yourself gets to me.

pi

  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 14348
  • Doctor.
  • Respect: +2376
Re: Teacher quality vs Studying
« Reply #47 on: December 22, 2011, 05:42:07 pm »
+1
Just wondering what constitutes a "bad" teacher. Everyone is saying, 'Aww we have crap teachers'. What makes them crap?

Attributes of my 3/4 physics teacher and 1/2 english teacher combined
1) Speaks in a monotone
2) Speaks in an accent that make it very hard to understand what he/she is saying
3) Doesn't actually know the details of the course material
4) Discourages asking questions
5) Uses other teacher's power points and web-links due to their own laziness/noobness
6) Comes to class late and leaves early on a regular basis
7) Picks up their mobile (with a crappy ring-tone) whilst teaching or during a SAC (and talks loudly on it)
8 ) Gives wrong information
9) Doesn't tell us when the next SAC is
10) Teaches out of A+ Notes
 
« Last Edit: January 02, 2017, 09:52:15 pm by pi »

illuminati

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 215
  • Respect: +7
Re: Teacher quality vs Studying
« Reply #48 on: December 22, 2011, 06:04:55 pm »
+1
YEAH PI
WITH OUR 3/4 PHYSICS TEACHER I'M AMAZED I GOT 38

Moderator action: removed real name, sorry for the inconvenience
« Last Edit: January 02, 2017, 09:52:29 pm by pi »
2010: Chinese SL (36 ---> 45.6), Accounting (48 ---> 48.4)
2011: English (47), Methods (50), Spesh (43 ----> 52.7), Chemistry (48 ----> 49.3), Physics (38)
ATAR: 99.90
2011 UMAT:
S1:[105] S2:[45] S3:[90] Overall:[80] Percentile: 100th

Need chem/methods tutoring?
I'm offering it based predominantly in the south-eastern suburbs (Caulfield-ish) - PM me.

dc302

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1031
  • Respect: +53
  • School: Melbourne High School
  • School Grad Year: 2009
Re: Teacher quality vs Studying
« Reply #49 on: December 22, 2011, 06:18:37 pm »
+5
I personally believe VCE is a real test of how much you can do for yourself. In fact, I think you SHOULD learn the stuff yourself and revise/practice at your own (accelerated) pace, in order to maximise your results. I don't think I would have gotten as high a score if I just relied on my teachers, regardless of how good they were.
2012-2015 - Doctor of Medicine (MD) @ UniMelb
2010-2011 - Bachelor of Science (BSc) majoring in Pure Mathematics @ UniMelb
2009 - VCE [99.70] -- Eng [43] - Methods [44] - Chem [44] - JapSL [45] - Spesh [45] - MUEP Jap [5.5]

luken93

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3060
  • Respect: +114
Re: Teacher quality vs Studying
« Reply #50 on: December 22, 2011, 06:21:31 pm »
0
I personally believe VCE is a real test of how much you can do for yourself. In fact, I think you SHOULD learn the stuff yourself and revise/practice at your own (accelerated) pace, in order to maximise your results. I don't think I would have gotten as high a score if I just relied on my teachers, regardless of how good they were.
+1
2010: Business Management [47]
2011: English [44]   |   Chemistry [45]  |   Methods [44]   |   Specialist [42]   |   MUEP Chemistry [5.0]   |   ATAR: 99.60
UMAT: 69 | 56 | 82 | = [69 / 98th Percentile]
2012: MBBS I @ Monash

illuminati

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 215
  • Respect: +7
Re: Teacher quality vs Studying
« Reply #51 on: December 22, 2011, 06:22:28 pm »
+1
I personally believe VCE is a real test of how much you can do for yourself. In fact, I think you SHOULD learn the stuff yourself and revise/practice at your own (accelerated) pace, in order to maximise your results. I don't think I would have gotten as high a score if I just relied on my teachers, regardless of how good they were.

It's not even how much you self-study. I think sometimes it can be just how well you can absorb information from them, and how efficient this process is. If you have fantastic teachers you don't listen to, you're probably going to be worse of than someone with a bad teacher who has the ability to still absorb all information provided.

Take the one kid in our physics class who got 49 - he was the only one that actually paid attention...
2010: Chinese SL (36 ---> 45.6), Accounting (48 ---> 48.4)
2011: English (47), Methods (50), Spesh (43 ----> 52.7), Chemistry (48 ----> 49.3), Physics (38)
ATAR: 99.90
2011 UMAT:
S1:[105] S2:[45] S3:[90] Overall:[80] Percentile: 100th

Need chem/methods tutoring?
I'm offering it based predominantly in the south-eastern suburbs (Caulfield-ish) - PM me.

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: Teacher quality vs Studying
« Reply #52 on: December 22, 2011, 06:24:19 pm »
+1
The best teacher is yourself.
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

b^3

  • Honorary Moderator
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3529
  • Overloading, just don't do it.
  • Respect: +631
  • School: Western Suburbs Area
  • School Grad Year: 2011
Re: Teacher quality vs Studying
« Reply #53 on: December 22, 2011, 06:26:35 pm »
+1
If you have fantastic teachers you don't listen to, you're probably going to be worse of than someone with a bad teacher who has the ability to still absorb all information provided.
As long as the information that is provided is correct. Otherwise we are working backwards here.
2012-2016: Aerospace Engineering/Science (Double Major in Applied Mathematics - Monash Uni)
TI-NSPIRE GUIDES: METH, SPESH

Co-Authored AtarNotes' Maths Study Guides


I'm starting to get too old for this... May be on here or irc from time to time.

pi

  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 14348
  • Doctor.
  • Respect: +2376
Re: Teacher quality vs Studying
« Reply #54 on: December 22, 2011, 06:29:02 pm »
0
If you have fantastic teachers you don't listen to, you're probably going to be worse of than someone with a bad teacher who has the ability to still absorb all information provided.
As long as the information that is provided is correct. Otherwise we are working backwards here.

In the case Illuminate was giving, I'm not sure our teacher was providing the correct info tbh

paulsterio

  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 4803
  • I <3 2SHAN
  • Respect: +430
Re: Teacher quality vs Studying
« Reply #55 on: December 22, 2011, 09:46:32 pm »
0

2) Speaks in an accent that make it very hard to understand what he/she is saying


pi, don't be mean, they can't help that! :P LOL!

Moderator action: removed real name, sorry for the inconvenience
« Last Edit: January 02, 2017, 07:13:36 pm by pi »

Stick

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3774
  • Sticky. :P
  • Respect: +467
Re: Teacher quality vs Studying
« Reply #56 on: December 22, 2011, 10:03:38 pm »
0
Just wondering what constitutes a "bad" teacher. Everyone is saying, 'Aww we have crap teachers'. What makes them crap?

Telling the class to book plane tickets to understand the cost of overseas travel, and then going on to book his own plane tickets by mistake. He then called up the airline to cancel them and had to pay a $50 low-cost airline cancellation fee.

Also giving whole class 50% for an assignment for not being able to open a Windows file on his Macbook.

No joke. This happened this year in Economics. It was the first year I had studied the subject and because of him, I hate a subject I was predicting to like. Luckily I'm only in Year 10.
2017-2020: Doctor of Medicine - The University of Melbourne
2014-2016: Bachelor of Biomedicine - The University of Melbourne

Tragesty

  • New South Welsh
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 327
  • Respect: +1
  • School: Wheelers Hill Secondary College
  • School Grad Year: 2012
Re: Teacher quality vs Studying
« Reply #57 on: December 22, 2011, 10:05:51 pm »
0
Not going to lie, it's kind of nice, in a non-rude way,  to know that some prestigious schools do indeed have teachers as crap as some I've come across (average state school).

pi

  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 14348
  • Doctor.
  • Respect: +2376
Re: Teacher quality vs Studying
« Reply #58 on: December 22, 2011, 10:17:40 pm »
0

2) Speaks in an accent that make it very hard to understand what he/she is saying


pi, don't be mean, they can't help that! :P LOL!

It's probably not nice to say, but it has to be said. It can make learning VERY hard, my 1/2 english teacher was a great example.

Moderator action: removed real name, sorry for the inconvenience
« Last Edit: January 02, 2017, 07:13:22 pm by pi »

max payne

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 318
  • Respect: +22
  • School Grad Year: 2012
Re: Teacher quality vs Studying
« Reply #59 on: December 22, 2011, 10:31:54 pm »
0
Just wondering what constitutes a "bad" teacher. Everyone is saying, 'Aww we have crap teachers'. What makes them crap?

forgetting to plug in the charger for a laptop....every fricking lesson! Then swearing and smacking the laptop when it shuts down midway in a powerpoint.

telling us he'll email our sac and exam revision sheets(because he's too lazy to print them out?). Wouldn't mind...only the class NEVER recieves them. Then he blames the class insisting that he has a degree in IT and knows how to email(he doesn't. he is a complete computer-illiterate)

Giving us about 15 min for physics pracs even though they require 15 min to set up and another 30min to do them and write up the report.

Giving us an  "easy 15 minute, 5 question test". Would should be fine. I mean 3 min per question sounds reasonable....until we discover that each question is 5 questions long( 1.a,b,c,d,e) then giving us our lunch time to complete them when realising that the class isn't as fast or smart as him..

just to name a few