Makes sense.... I'm sure that people aren't made with a 'soulmate' but what I mean is that you have to be sure- absolutely sure about the person. You have to know that person inside out, have overcome obstacles with them, met their friends and family, argued together, laughed together and made a commitment to one another BEFORE the sexual element is part of the relationship - this could take months, maybe years... But I've seen so many people swap these things around or intertwine them and thats when it can be dangerous because you dont even REALLY know the person you are giving yourself away to or if you are going to stay together - for some people this is ok and they dont mind experimenting with different people in various relationships...But idunno ... I would just feel like second - hand material if I did that
Well, I would not agree entirely with regards to when sexual trysts should be on the agenda. It is up the individual and their view of sex in the relationship. Some people do not view sex as giving oneself away; it is simply a pleasurable experience between two sexually attracted people. However reckless you may view that, I think it is up to the person individually to come to terms with their view of sex. Some, like yourself, see it as a component that exists in a committed relationship and not a casual thing. That is perfectly fine, and probably the most traditionally admirable. I do not understand this mentality of having someone being being "used" or "second hand". Virginity is only given any high status because it has been epitomised as representative as chastity in the major monotheistic faiths. These faiths are central to most of our ethical views, traditionally speaking. Personally, the existence of a hymen or perforated hymen is a non-issue to me. If you feel strongly for someone, you feel strongly for someone.
Sure, thats why I said for some people its ok because its just another pleasurable act - I regard it differently as I have already explained nd understand its a very personal thing 
As for virginity, its just a layer of skin and is not what defines purity
I have girls in my class that have done everything you can think of except the actual 'deed' and walk around proud to be 'virgins'. Thats absolute BS
If I was going according to religion than does this mean that a girl who was raped is no longer 'pure' - No I don't believe in that
What I meant by 'used' or 'second hand' is that if every guy who I shared some sort of mutual interest with in the past or in the years to come shared some sort of 'experience' with me - whether it even just be just a kiss ... Then, i wouldnt feel good - I would just feel easy and cheap - honesty, if he wants it hes gotta work for it
And I disagree about the just pleasure part because I'm more than just an animal, my mind and emotions are more sophisticated and of higher priority. I need to fulfill my emotional needs before my physical ones and exrercise some kind of self-control
*just realised I said  'just' too many times