Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

November 01, 2025, 09:29:58 am

Author Topic: Question about motion  (Read 2042 times)  Share 

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Genericname2365

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 560
  • Respect: +11
  • School Grad Year: 2012
Question about motion
« on: February 12, 2012, 06:54:53 pm »
0
There doesn't appear to be any one thread to post in like the in Methods section, so I thought I'd just make this.

I'm having trouble figuring out this question:

6. A 200 g snooker ball with initial velocity 9.0 ms to the right collides with a stationary snooker ball of mass 100g. After the collision, both balls are moving to the right. The 200g ball has a speed of 3 m s while the 100g ball has a speed of 12 m s.
A) Determine the total kinetic energy of the system before the collision.

I tried using Ek=1/2 mv² (although admittedly the information provided only gives the initial velocity) but that didn't work. Can anyone tell me what I'm supposed to do? My theoretical grasp of this area is not particularly strong.
ATAR: 93.35
Bachelor of Arts at UoM

Phy124

  • Honorary Moderator
  • Part of the furniture
  • *******
  • Posts: 1354
  • Respect: +464
Re: Question about motion
« Reply #1 on: February 12, 2012, 07:00:14 pm »
0
"A 200 g snooker ball with initial velocity 9.0 ms"

You have both mass and the velocity for your equation :)

where .b1 = ball 1, .b2 = ball 2



edit: put 7 in the calc, by accident...
« Last Edit: February 12, 2012, 07:14:22 pm by Phy124 »
2011
Mathematical Methods | Physics | Chemistry | English | Business Management

2012-2017
Bachelor of Science in Applied Mathematics and Bachelor of Civil Engineering (Honours) @ Monash University

Current
Transport Modeller @ Arup

Genericname2365

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 560
  • Respect: +11
  • School Grad Year: 2012
Re: Question about motion
« Reply #2 on: February 12, 2012, 07:04:40 pm »
0
"A 200 g snooker ball with initial velocity 9.0 ms"

You have both mass and the velocity for your equation :)

E = Ek.b1 + Ek.b2 =


I forgot to mention the answer is listed as 8.1 J.
Edit: Wait, I just got that answer...
ATAR: 93.35
Bachelor of Arts at UoM

b^3

  • Honorary Moderator
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3529
  • Overloading, just don't do it.
  • Respect: +631
  • School: Western Suburbs Area
  • School Grad Year: 2011
Re: Question about motion
« Reply #3 on: February 12, 2012, 07:06:57 pm »
0
Phy124 your working is right but

EDIT: nvm Genericname2365 worked it out.
2012-2016: Aerospace Engineering/Science (Double Major in Applied Mathematics - Monash Uni)
TI-NSPIRE GUIDES: METH, SPESH

Co-Authored AtarNotes' Maths Study Guides


I'm starting to get too old for this... May be on here or irc from time to time.

Genericname2365

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 560
  • Respect: +11
  • School Grad Year: 2012
Re: Question about motion
« Reply #4 on: February 12, 2012, 07:08:22 pm »
0
"A 200 g snooker ball with initial velocity 9.0 ms"

You have both mass and the velocity for your equation :)

where .b1 = ball 1, .b2 = ball 2


Phy124 your working is right but
Ok thanks for the help, I forgot to square the velocity. *sigh*
ATAR: 93.35
Bachelor of Arts at UoM

rife168

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 408
  • Respect: +36
  • School Grad Year: 2012
Re: Question about motion
« Reply #5 on: February 12, 2012, 07:09:43 pm »
0
Because it asks for the total energy of the system, you have to analyse all of the different objects.
In this case, you only have to worry about the 200g ball, as the 100g ball is stationary. Were the 200g ball and 100g ball moving relative to the system, then you would have to consider the kinetic energy of both the balls.
Good to see you figured it out.
2012: VCE - 99.10
2013: PhB(Sci)@ANU

Phy124

  • Honorary Moderator
  • Part of the furniture
  • *******
  • Posts: 1354
  • Respect: +464
Re: Question about motion
« Reply #6 on: February 12, 2012, 07:15:32 pm »
0
I accidently put 7 into the windows calculator instead of 9, my apologies...

*facepalm*
2011
Mathematical Methods | Physics | Chemistry | English | Business Management

2012-2017
Bachelor of Science in Applied Mathematics and Bachelor of Civil Engineering (Honours) @ Monash University

Current
Transport Modeller @ Arup

b^3

  • Honorary Moderator
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3529
  • Overloading, just don't do it.
  • Respect: +631
  • School: Western Suburbs Area
  • School Grad Year: 2011
Re: Question about motion
« Reply #7 on: February 12, 2012, 07:16:36 pm »
0
Also note that if it is an isolated system, then the engery before and after should be the same. And doing the maths, it is.
Before
"A 200 g snooker ball with initial velocity 9.0 ms"

You have both mass and the velocity for your equation :)

E = Ek.b1 + Ek.b2 =


After
E = Ek.b1 + Ek.b2 =

2012-2016: Aerospace Engineering/Science (Double Major in Applied Mathematics - Monash Uni)
TI-NSPIRE GUIDES: METH, SPESH

Co-Authored AtarNotes' Maths Study Guides


I'm starting to get too old for this... May be on here or irc from time to time.

Genericname2365

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 560
  • Respect: +11
  • School Grad Year: 2012
Re: Question about motion
« Reply #8 on: February 25, 2012, 07:13:53 pm »
0
Circular motion question. I'm going through Checkpoints and they have a number of questions about why people are lighter or heavier at the top/bottom of a vertical circular motion, and the answer is often in reference to . How do you derive this formula?
I know the formulas and , but I don't understand how to get this.
ATAR: 93.35
Bachelor of Arts at UoM

Phy124

  • Honorary Moderator
  • Part of the furniture
  • *******
  • Posts: 1354
  • Respect: +464
Re: Question about motion
« Reply #9 on: February 25, 2012, 08:59:52 pm »
0
I'm not exactly sure what "R" represents (is that the normal force?), but the formula is derived by forces upward against forces downwards.



*Note, the centripetal force is not a third force, but the net force.

For example, in figure 1, both the gravitational and normal forces are downward, so:



Where as, in figure 2, the normal force is up, whilst the gravitational force is down, so:

2011
Mathematical Methods | Physics | Chemistry | English | Business Management

2012-2017
Bachelor of Science in Applied Mathematics and Bachelor of Civil Engineering (Honours) @ Monash University

Current
Transport Modeller @ Arup

Genericname2365

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 560
  • Respect: +11
  • School Grad Year: 2012
Re: Question about motion
« Reply #10 on: March 08, 2012, 06:14:46 pm »
0
ls 0.054 an acceptable answer when the answer is 5.40 × 10–2? (Gravity) If not, do you think I should get a newer calculator?
ATAR: 93.35
Bachelor of Arts at UoM

Phy124

  • Honorary Moderator
  • Part of the furniture
  • *******
  • Posts: 1354
  • Respect: +464
Re: Question about motion
« Reply #11 on: March 08, 2012, 06:20:29 pm »
0
ls 0.054 an acceptable answer when the answer is 5.40 × 10–2? (Gravity) If not, do you think I should get a newer calculator?
If the question is looking for 3 significant figures and you wish to write it in the form you have above, you would need to write 0.0540 (as the 0's before the 5 do not count) which is the same as 5.40 x 10-2
2011
Mathematical Methods | Physics | Chemistry | English | Business Management

2012-2017
Bachelor of Science in Applied Mathematics and Bachelor of Civil Engineering (Honours) @ Monash University

Current
Transport Modeller @ Arup

Genericname2365

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 560
  • Respect: +11
  • School Grad Year: 2012
Re: Question about motion
« Reply #12 on: March 08, 2012, 06:25:19 pm »
0
ls 0.054 an acceptable answer when the answer is 5.40 × 10–2? (Gravity) If not, do you think I should get a newer calculator?
If the question is looking for 3 significant figures and you wish to write it in the form you have above, you would need to write 0.0540 (as the 0's before the 5 do not count) which is the same as 5.40 x 10-2
So the zero after the 54 because of the -2?
ATAR: 93.35
Bachelor of Arts at UoM

yawho

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 213
  • Respect: +2
Re: Question about motion
« Reply #13 on: March 09, 2012, 08:08:47 pm »
0
A 1000 kg carriage moves at constant speed of 15 m/s in a vertical circle of radius 25 m. What is the magnitude and direction of the net force on the carriage at (a) the top, (b) bottom and (c) mid way between the top and the bottom of the circle?

Genericname2365

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 560
  • Respect: +11
  • School Grad Year: 2012
Re: Question about motion
« Reply #14 on: May 03, 2012, 08:35:51 pm »
0
V40 kΩ = I total × 40 kΩ = 0.205 × 40 = 8.2 V

I'm probably missing an obvious concept here (as displayed in my previous posts in this thread :P) but I don't understand why 40kΩ is not being converted to 40,000Ω. Could anyone tell me why it's just left as 40kΩ?
ATAR: 93.35
Bachelor of Arts at UoM