I have writing problems; I have a ganglion on my wrist that flares up when I write, so I cannot write fast at all. As a result, I did not finish A SINGLE EXAM (it was worse in English and Literature where I didn't finish a single essay for both exams - I had to leave them all half-finished to try and attain maximum marks. It was even worse for my Revolutions exam where I had a blood nose part-way through (I was sick in that week) which lasted at least twenty minutes (Not part of my argument; I'm just complaining about it

).
So I had my fair share of problems that resulted in an ATAR score that was likely to be lower than what I could have potentially achieved. However, I didn't complain because I got well beyond the score I needed, which was all that mattered. This girl (and her mother) obviously fails to realise there is absolutely nothing to gain from these actions. The ATAR score is not a score of intelligence; that's why it becomes invalid after a year. It is simply a score to get into the university course you desire, nothing more. She seems to be the kind of person who will hold on to her ATAR score for the rest of her life, believing she is smarter than anyone purely because of it (even twenty years later).
A friend of mine went through Year 12 with chronic fatigue, and ended up completing four subjects which resulted in an ATAR score around 88. He was extremely happy with it because it got him into the course he wanted. He could have done much better, but didn't even complain or even use SEAS. This person by the way, is probably one of the smartest people I've ever met.