Thush, I know your judgement is different to mine and I also acknowledge that my judgement isn't always right, however, I never called him stupid to begin with, I said that those who follow fundamentalist religions are stupid, and the truth is, they are, because fundamentalist religions are the root cause of many of the problems of the world, including the oppression of women in the middle east, the concept of crusades and war on religion, and now this whole violence issue.
I think that it's reasonable to say that fundamentalist religion does more bad than good, especially in this day and age where we should be promoting peaceful co-existence, which fundamentalist religions (I'm not saying fundamentalist Islam here, I'm saying fundamentalist religion in general) often opposes.
abcdefghijklmnop then decided to call me stupid for making a reasonable judgement and proceeds to begin an argument with me and it was him who asked me if it was stupid for him to be angry. I never had the intention of calling anyone stupid to begin with (just fundamentalist religion as a concept), abcdefghijklmnop then decides to make matters personal and involve himself in it. From what I could see, I gave him a reasonable reply, which was that if he is to get angry over something like this (which isn't even attacking him personally) then he is stupid.
It's like me knowing you like Apple Macs, then me making a retarded video about how Steve Jobs was a womaniser and how Apple is an ethically wrong company...etc. If you got angry over that and started throwing bricks at my house because I made a dumb video about something you like (something you agree with...etc.) then that is quite stupid.
Not only should violence be condoned, but anger as well, because anger is the root cause of the violence, if anger is curbed, then the violence would not be necessary in the first place.