Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

November 01, 2025, 11:43:13 am

Author Topic: Chemistry 3/4 2013 Thread  (Read 448755 times)  Share 

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Edward21

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 625
  • Don't ask me, all I do is calculate pH.
  • Respect: +27
Re: Chemistry 3/4 2013 Thread
« Reply #330 on: January 26, 2013, 10:31:12 pm »
+1
I learnt a different 3: stable when heated. :S
That sounds very plausible
2012 Biology [44] 2013 Chemistry [50] Italian [38] English [48] Health & HD [45] Methods [34] ATAR: 99.10

2014-2016 Bachelor of Biomedicine - The University of Melbourne


Stick

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3774
  • Sticky. :P
  • Respect: +467
Re: Chemistry 3/4 2013 Thread
« Reply #331 on: January 26, 2013, 10:32:44 pm »
0
Well that's what the textbook says. If it isn't stable when heated, the chemical composition of the precipitate may change.
2017-2020: Doctor of Medicine - The University of Melbourne
2014-2016: Bachelor of Biomedicine - The University of Melbourne

Limista

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 944
  • Respect: +63
  • School Grad Year: 2013
Re: Chemistry 3/4 2013 Thread
« Reply #332 on: January 26, 2013, 10:39:05 pm »
+1
I learnt a different 3: stable when heated. :S

How is that different to what Thushan said? My understanding of this is:

When heated, the substance is inert in air or stable and unreactive in the atmosphere.

Well that's what the textbook says. If it isn't stable when heated, the chemical composition of the precipitate may change.

...Which would in turn change the molar/formula mass of the substance only if it is not a primary standard. However this does not mean that the precipitate is not suitable for use in standard solution. So yeah...
Bachelor of Biomedicine @ The University of Melbourne (II) 2014-2016
Follow me on my blog

Stick

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3774
  • Sticky. :P
  • Respect: +467
Re: Chemistry 3/4 2013 Thread
« Reply #333 on: January 26, 2013, 10:40:20 pm »
0
Fair enough. What's a primary standard?
2017-2020: Doctor of Medicine - The University of Melbourne
2014-2016: Bachelor of Biomedicine - The University of Melbourne

Limista

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 944
  • Respect: +63
  • School Grad Year: 2013
Re: Chemistry 3/4 2013 Thread
« Reply #334 on: January 26, 2013, 10:43:02 pm »
+1
Fair enough. What's a primary standard?

Can be used to make a more accurate standard solution, because it has certain properties (e.g. high molar mass to decrease likelihood or chance of percentage error, exact known chemical formula etc...)
Bachelor of Biomedicine @ The University of Melbourne (II) 2014-2016
Follow me on my blog

Stick

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3774
  • Sticky. :P
  • Respect: +467
Re: Chemistry 3/4 2013 Thread
« Reply #335 on: January 26, 2013, 10:43:49 pm »
0
And what's a standard solution? I don't recall learning any of this.
2017-2020: Doctor of Medicine - The University of Melbourne
2014-2016: Bachelor of Biomedicine - The University of Melbourne

Limista

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 944
  • Respect: +63
  • School Grad Year: 2013
Re: Chemistry 3/4 2013 Thread
« Reply #336 on: January 26, 2013, 10:47:13 pm »
+1
And what's a standard solution? I don't recall learning any of this.

You probably haven't learnt it yet because it's part of gravimetric analysis (I think! or was it volumetric?.. LOL) in the 3/4 course. Have you started studying the 3/4 course? If not, that's probably why you aren't aware of it yet. That's cool - just flip to it in your 3/4 textbook! I was just looking ahead in the 3/4 course myself a couple of days back.  :)
Bachelor of Biomedicine @ The University of Melbourne (II) 2014-2016
Follow me on my blog

KevinooBz

  • Guest
Re: Chemistry 3/4 2013 Thread
« Reply #337 on: January 26, 2013, 10:53:03 pm »
+1
And what's a standard solution? I don't recall learning any of this.
standard solution is made from primary standard from memory. It just reduces the potential error. Imagine trying to add 1g of a powder. When doing titration you can't really control how exact your adding of primary standard is and your solution will almost change colour instantly so you can't really calculate anything accurately. If you diluted it with 50ml of water, you can be much more accurate when slowly adding the standard solution. My teacher briefly went through this when we were performing a titration experiment.
« Last Edit: January 26, 2013, 11:00:04 pm by KevinooBz »

Stick

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3774
  • Sticky. :P
  • Respect: +467
Re: Chemistry 3/4 2013 Thread
« Reply #338 on: January 26, 2013, 10:54:58 pm »
0
You probably haven't learnt it yet because it's part of gravimetric analysis (I think! or was it volumetric?.. LOL) in the 3/4 course. Have you started studying the 3/4 course? If not, that's probably why you aren't aware of it yet. That's cool - just flip to it in your 3/4 textbook! I was just looking ahead in the 3/4 course myself a couple of days back.  :)

I've done gravimetric analysis, but I haven't looked at volumetric analysis just yet. I have a gravimetric analysis SAC in the first week back so I'm thinking it's something that's covered in the next chapter. I hope so!
2017-2020: Doctor of Medicine - The University of Melbourne
2014-2016: Bachelor of Biomedicine - The University of Melbourne

Reckoner

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 489
  • Respect: +60
  • School Grad Year: 2012
Re: Chemistry 3/4 2013 Thread
« Reply #339 on: January 26, 2013, 10:57:13 pm »
+1
^You're correct Stick don't fret, they're part of volumetric analysis.

Stick

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3774
  • Sticky. :P
  • Respect: +467
Re: Chemistry 3/4 2013 Thread
« Reply #340 on: January 26, 2013, 11:00:25 pm »
0
Alright, thanks everyone. :) Also, when do we learn to use units like ppm, w/w etc? Was I supposed to have already learnt it?
2017-2020: Doctor of Medicine - The University of Melbourne
2014-2016: Bachelor of Biomedicine - The University of Melbourne

Math Nerd

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 23
  • Respect: 0
  • School: Mathematics High
Re: Chemistry 3/4 2013 Thread
« Reply #341 on: January 26, 2013, 11:02:05 pm »
0
The combustion of octane in excess air can represented as: C8H18(g)+12.5 O2(g) -> 8CO2(g)+9H2)(l)
To produce 176g of CO2 in this reaction:

x mole of C8H18 needs to react with x mole of O2

*So for ive worked out n(CO2)=176/44=4mol, im not sure what to do next.

Stick

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3774
  • Sticky. :P
  • Respect: +467
Re: Chemistry 3/4 2013 Thread
« Reply #342 on: January 26, 2013, 11:04:22 pm »
0
Use the mole ratio in the given equation. It says 1 mole of octane and 12.5 moles of oxygen will produce 8 moles of carbon dioxide. :)
« Last Edit: January 26, 2013, 11:11:50 pm by Stick »
2017-2020: Doctor of Medicine - The University of Melbourne
2014-2016: Bachelor of Biomedicine - The University of Melbourne

Math Nerd

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 23
  • Respect: 0
  • School: Mathematics High
Re: Chemistry 3/4 2013 Thread
« Reply #343 on: January 26, 2013, 11:18:11 pm »
0
Yay got it ;D

paulsterio

  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 4803
  • I <3 2SHAN
  • Respect: +430
Re: Chemistry 3/4 2013 Thread
« Reply #344 on: January 26, 2013, 11:23:36 pm »
0
And what's a standard solution? I don't recall learning any of this.

Solution made from a primary standard with a KNOWN concentration.

It's just definitions, you'll get to it.