Again, apologies for intruding into your thread.
How many of you have already chosen your bottom two? Do you reckon this is a good strategical move to focus time on the top 4 subjects?
In theory, perhaps, but I think that this is a (potentially) flawed strategy. I say this through experience, for it is a strategy that I tried to use with little success. I ignored Further during the year for sake of VisCom, even doing my folios during Further classes. I was of the opinion that one high score and one relatively low score (in the bottom 2) would be better for me than two mid-range scores. However, I somehow ended up with a higher study score for Further (the greatest injustice in the history of the world) than VisCom.
At the end of the day, if I divided my effort between the two subjects more equally, I think I would have achieved a superior aggregate score.
Anyway, that's just my experience - it probably differs from person to person - but I thought I'd contribute my two cents just to warm people to at least be wary of putting all of their metaphorical eggs in a few metaphorical baskets.
All the best.

EDIT I: Beaten by the two responses above this one, which basically summarised my thoughts.
EDIT II: And also the response below this one.