What do we need to know about primary and secondary cells? How do relate them to Daniell (Galvanic)Cells?
What sort of questions come up for primary and secondary cells?
You should be able to:
- define and compare primary and secondary cells (it's a simple matter of non-rechargeable vs. rechargeable, respectively)
- explain what enables secondary cells to be recharged (your textbook should give a pretty good - and simple - explanation)
- apply your knowledge of the electrochemical series, anodes and cathodes, etc. to real-life examples of these cells (take a look at some VCAA exams)
How do you relate primary and secondary cells to galvanic cells? Primary and secondary cells are types of galvanic cells. They transform chemical energy directly to electrical energy via a spontaneous redox reaction. When a secondary cell is being recharged, though, the discharge reaction is reversed, becoming a non-spontaneous reaction, and so a secondary cell being recharged can be thought of as acting as an electrolytic cell. Electrolytic cells are in many ways the opposite of galvanic cells.
I can't give you any more specific advice, as your questions are fairly broad. Taking a look at some VCAA exams will give you an idea of what's expected of you, and you should definitely also have a read of the relevant section of the study design.
Let us know if you have any more questions

Hi guys, would greatly appreciate if someone could answer these:
1. other than ionisation, dissociation and hydrolysis are there any other words that mean the same that could come up in the exam?
2. do we not consider equilibrium for strong acids? (ie single arrow?)
3. Find the pH of a 0.20 micromolar solution of HCl. Here do we assume that HCl completely ionises and hence [HCl]=[H3O+]? Hence it's just a normal pH question rather than an acid-base equilibria question?
4. In most cases, why do we assume that [acid ion]=[H+]?
5. In what cases do we not make the assumption that [acid ion]=[H+] and that [acid initial]=[acid @ equilibrium]?
Thanks so much!
Just wanted to add on vox's response:
1. The reaction of a weak acid with water can be thought of as an ionisation reaction, a dissociation reaction and a hydrolysis reaction. But this does not mean that all these reactions types are the same thing! Sometimes a reaction can be classified as one or two of these things, but not all three. An ionisation reaction generally refers to when an electrically neutral compound reacts to form ions (e.g., the ionisation of an acid or base in water); a dissociation reaction is when a compound breaks apart in some way (e.g., the ionisation of an acid, but also the dissolution of a salt); a hydrolysis reaction refers to a reaction in which water is added to a substance, which often causes that substance to break apart into smaller components (e.g., the ionisation of an acid, but also the catabolism of biopolymers such as carbohydrates, proteins and nucleic acids).
4. We often assume that [conjugate base]
equilbrium = [H
3O
+]
equilibrium for two reasons: (1) these two products are produced in a 1:1 mole ratio; (2) the self-ionisation of water occurs only to a very small extent. In reality, the concentration of hydronium ions is greater due to the self-ionisation of water, but this is so small that it can be considered negligible (i.e., can be ignored).
5.
If you want an example of when the assumption that [conjugate base]
equilibrium = [H
3O
+]
equilibrium is not valid, take a look at VCAA 2011, Exam 2, Section B, Question 6bi. The concentration of methanoate ions becomes greater due to the addition of sodium methanoate.
If you want an example of when the assumption that [acid]
equilibrium = [acid]
initial is not valid, take a look at VCAA 2012 Exam 2, Section B, Question 3d - a notoriously difficult question. The assumption is not valid in this case because sorbic acid has a relatively high acidity constant for a weak acid, ionising closer to 50% as opposed to 0%, and because VCAA provided you with enough information to actually calculate [sorbic acid]
initial. VCAA explained that the fact that [sorbic acid]
initial was not already given in the question should have signalled to students not to make the assumption.
EDIT: Apparently I'm one of those people who can't use "your" and "you're" correctly
