Why do we analyse conserved genes e.g. cytochrome C instead of non-coding regions? (For determining evolutionary relationships)
For molecular clocks between more distantly related species, cytochrome C is commonly used as it is heavily conserved meaning It will be present in essentially all cells that have mitochondria and thus will be a good gene for comparison. Cytochrome C also has a slower mutation rate then non-coding regions as natural selection acts on the cytochrome C gene selecting against some mutations that reduce fitness. This makes it good for comparison amongst more distantly related species.
however non-coding regions can also be used and offer a higher mutation rate which is useful for comparison of more closely related organisms.
What are differences in phenotype between hominins and great apes?
What exactly would you write for the overall ATP yield for aerobic respiration? Would 30-38 ATP be okay...? I think Douchy said something like that?
hominins are a tribe consisting of humans and their extinct bipedal ancestors. great apes (or hominids) is a family consisting of hominins as well as other animals like gorillas and chimps.
If you had to say one phenotypic characteristic that separated hominins from other hominids, you probably should state bipedalism (and all the morphological differences which support bipedalism like the larger heel bone, more central foramen magnum...)
Aerobic respiration actually produces 36-38, but you should choose just one to write (so i have heard)