how philosophical can we be about mod C - my elective is people and politics. im not super far into my prescribed text, brave new world, but ive been having interesting discussions with people about human existence and how society/politics effects human life and like a lot of philosophical stuff.
specifically the idea of religion based societies being inherently evil, due to the nature that people predicate their existence and actions based on the life they will have - be it the fiery depths of hell, or eternal pleasures of heaven and rewards. and in focussing so much on where they want to go people don't get to experience the vital moments that help us grow and change - and in changing so much as we move towards a goal we dont realise the significance of all we have become and done rendering much of our lives meaningless and without passion.
furthermore this is contrasted to the other extremity in the world state where people do not live for their own selves and betterment but the development of society and the world state - that individuality is squashed out and moments that are so vital to human existence become blurred and similarly meaningless. this goes along with the idea of happiness in the text, whilst happiness is 'bliss' it is the bliss of forgetting all around you in a moment - knowing YOU are in a perfect moment, knowing YOU are in love, remembering a fond moment, having fun, it is not forgetting everything else their could be or not knowing there is more, or not experiencing the different moments that promote growth and human development. stability is a means of confinement and emotional 'safety', it is not happiness (sorry i thought this much better than i wrote - my main problem hahah). there is also already an evident theme of learning happiness - that people are programmed with happiness as though it is a condition and not a spontaneous occurence which inevitably lends meaning to life, the monotony described it not living it is existing - there is no light without dark and there is no happiness without sadness. similarly there is no evolution without obstacle - people's lives being so stable and static removes the key aspects that drive human growth and development and can be credited with every development human kind has seen - it is adversity and diversity that breeds modern human evolution, not stagnant plainness.
ok sorry for jumbled essay - a series of thoughts really. just wondering how philosophical (and if these are good ideas) we can be about meaning and human growth - abd how we should relate these to people and politics.