Hey!
I just wanted to ask for any english essay, how can you effectively incorporate an academic scholar's or 'readings' from a scholar in an essay? How can we do that and still maintain relevance to what the question is asking?
Thank you so much!
Hey, therese07!
Academic readings and scholars are great to include, especially for Module B, in your essays.To ensure that they are still relevant to the question, choose quotes that can be inserted in a fashion that doesn't disrupt or narrow the analysis. Basically, these quotes should ideally be conceptual and easy to adapt.
The quotes should reflect your personal appreciation of the text first and foremost; then, you can adjust them to suit the question. The readings that spark something in you, whether it resonates perfectly with how you feel about the text or you completely disagree with. Allow them to
enhance and guide the aspects of your judgement and thesis, as opposed to
determining it. Your original thoughts and perspectives are the most valuable and these critical readings should assist you in filling any gaps in your understanding of the text.
In the below spoiler, I have a sample paragraph from my Module B essay on
Cloudstreet which you can have a look at

The scholar quote is in bold and you can see how I have in-text referenced the source as well.
Cloudstreet Module B
Finally, Winton’s attraction to water bodies was catalysed from personal experience and fabricated to endorse a reaction of closure from reconciliation. The author’s background as a surfer is evident in the imagery of water, notably the river, in ‘Cloudstreet’, extending to appeal to Australian audiences. The river’s situation at the beginning and the end of the novel fringes the process of Fish’s reconciliation of self, mirroring Winton’s contemporaries’ expectations to experience reconciliation during the Bicentennial. Winton’s admiration of “the beautiful, the beautiful river” repetitiously articulates his appreciation for the natural aesthetic of the water and how Fish would “savour that healing all the rest of the journey.” This innate, symbolic connection Fish has to the water after his separation of metaphysical self is evident in his dialogue “River! said Fish.” Absent of quotation marks, Winton foreshadows this unity that Fish aspires to achieve and sustains this with a second person address to Fish from his self that “not all of...had come back” in “your turn is coming.” By addressing the audience with the pronoun “your”, expectations of the final reconciliation are cultivated and endorsed by the author as a means to create empowerment. This ethereal experience is captured in the final sentences “Perfectly. Always. Everyplace. Me.” Reuniting with his identity, Fish becomes connected and whole which although ends in tragedy and may defy expectations, allows audiences to heal. Winton’s appeal is garnered from this unification as Fish endorses the timeless desire in the human condition to transcend physicality and reach eternal peace, as achieved from engaging in what Winton explores as a divine reunion after twenty years of passing. Whether audiences anticipate this cyclical narrative, Winton resolves the novel with this construction of river imagery and the emotional impact enables “the eye and imagination of the realist, alive to the mass and colour and sound of the sea and river” (Lyn McCredden, 2013), seamlessly unifying the novel and its coherent tale of reconciliation.
Hope this helps! Good luck with the essay

Angelina
