Hello!
When quoting verses from the Bible and Quran, is it necessary to have the verse numbers? I don't think I am able to memorise all those numbers...
Heya! Just adding to dancing phalanges response: knowing them is the best case scenario. Lets take the story of creation from the Old Testament for example:
Genesis 1:1-31. Now, in an exam, if I cannot remember the 1-31 part - the answer is still a correct reference if I say Genesis 1, it's just not as precise. So if you're struggling to recall it in the situation of an exam, take comfort in knowing you could drop the end part and it not be incorrect. In the situation of not being able to remember the reference at all - I'd give it a crack anyway. As dancing phalanges said, a marker is more likely to have question marks popping up if they cannot see the reference at all, compared to an attempted reference that could even be correct (the markers will know the major references, but that's not to say they will know every single reference you use to know on the spot if it's right or wrong).
Hey Elyse
I'm just looking at this question now - does core teachings relate to ethical teachings or principal beliefs? If ethical teachings for Christianity, they are:
• the Ten Commandments
• New Testament ethics
– the Beatitudes
– Jesus’ commandment of love
I can link Jesus' commandment of love to sexual ethics, marriage and even a paragraph on Paul really well. For the 10 commandments and beatitudes, am I taking specific ones out eg. Thou shall not commit adultery etc. and using it for sexual ethical teachings on adultery for instance or more just looking at what the 10 commandments and beatitudes represent for Christian followers? I also just had a question R.E the stimulus quote as I am really not sure what it means in relation to the question! Thank you 
Hi dancing phalanges

You did some good looking to find this in the forums!

This all sounds great. "Core teachings" in a question, without it specifying person, practice, or ethics, makes me think you can tap into ethical teachings and charge it that way, or relate it to the principal beliefs and connect that to other teachings of the religion - but they overlap so heavily there's almost no difference in how you wish to approach it.
As for the stimulus: "It has been often said very truly that religion is the thing that makes the ordinary person feel extraordinary. it is an equally important truth that religion is the thing that makes the extraordinary person feel ordinary. "
I DON'T like this stimulus because it uses strange descriptive words like "extraordinary" but whatever, the essence of it I like. So, that first part of focusing on the adherent - how does the core teachings make the ADHERENT feel a certain positive way? Then, the second part of the quote is focusing on a humbling experience for the adherent. So religion can be charged to make someone feel special, important, etc. But, it can also serve as a reminder for humility to serve in a religion. I hope this makes sense, ping back if not
