Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

November 01, 2025, 05:50:19 am

Author Topic: Rankings  (Read 4412 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

ilhan91

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 20
  • Respect: 0
Rankings
« on: September 07, 2009, 04:26:57 pm »
0
Hey guys,

Hypothetically if i am ranked second in business and the guy that is ranked first stuffs up on the exam and i go well, is there a possibility that i can beat him?
English- 35
LOTE-40
Business Management-39
Further Mathematics- 32
Accounting- 26

m@tty

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 4324
  • Respect: +33
  • School: Heatherton Christian College
  • School Grad Year: 2010
Re: Rankings
« Reply #1 on: September 07, 2009, 05:41:39 pm »
0
As in study score, yes definitely.
But the guy ranked first will receive a higher moderated SAC score.
2009/2010: Mathematical Methods(non-CAS) ; Business Management | English ; Literature - Physics ; Chemistry - Specialist Mathematics ; MUEP Maths

96.85

2011-2015: Bachelor of Aerospace Engineering and Bachelor of Science, Monash University

2015-____: To infinity and beyond.

bradysayer

  • Victorian
  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 48
  • Respect: 0
Re: Rankings
« Reply #2 on: October 03, 2009, 12:57:42 am »
0
As in study score, yes definitely.
But the guy ranked first will receive a higher moderated SAC score.

'higher moderated SAC score'


what does this mean?

m@tty

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 4324
  • Respect: +33
  • School: Heatherton Christian College
  • School Grad Year: 2010
Re: Rankings
« Reply #3 on: October 03, 2009, 10:06:05 pm »
0
The marks you receive in SAC's has only one purpose, the ranking of people in your school. Then based on your schools exam results they(VCAA/VTAC forget which one) will moderate your SAC scores, to ensure fairness while letting schools organise their own SACs. Moderation basically involves taking the exam score corresponding to an individuals SAC ranking, this then becomes their moderated SAC score.
Example:
The person ranked first in SACs will receive the highest exam score as their moderated SAC score.

So if you are ranked higher than someone in SACs, your moderated SAC mark should be higher than theirs.

2009/2010: Mathematical Methods(non-CAS) ; Business Management | English ; Literature - Physics ; Chemistry - Specialist Mathematics ; MUEP Maths

96.85

2011-2015: Bachelor of Aerospace Engineering and Bachelor of Science, Monash University

2015-____: To infinity and beyond.

ngRISING

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 688
  • Respect: +3
Re: Rankings
« Reply #4 on: October 04, 2009, 12:46:47 am »
0
say my friend, is ranked # 1 in sacs, im ranked like 7th.

if i do better then him in the exam by say 3 marks , will i be able to get a better study score and my sac mark standarised to his mark? sorry im just confused lol.
2008: Further Maths & LOTE
2009: English Language, Psychology, Maths Methods, Business Management and Physics
2010: Bachelor of Commerce @ Monash!
2011: Bachelor of Business-Logistics & Supply Chain Management (applied)

Employed by NAB.

TonyHem

  • Guest
Re: Rankings
« Reply #5 on: October 04, 2009, 12:51:03 am »
0
say my friend, is ranked # 1 in sacs, im ranked like 7th.

if i do better then him in the exam by say 3 marks , will i be able to get a better study score and my sac mark standarised to his mark? sorry im just confused lol.

He'll get higher I think.
If something as small as 3 marks puts you from an average rank to the top, there would be no point to sacs imo.

bradysayer

  • Victorian
  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 48
  • Respect: 0
Re: Rankings
« Reply #6 on: October 07, 2009, 09:43:43 pm »
0
The marks you receive in SAC's has only one purpose, the ranking of people in your school. Then based on your schools exam results they(VCAA/VTAC forget which one) will moderate your SAC scores, to ensure fairness while letting schools organise their own SACs. Moderation basically involves taking the exam score corresponding to an individuals SAC ranking, this then becomes their moderated SAC score.
Example:
The person ranked first in SACs will receive the highest exam score as their moderated SAC score.

So if you are ranked higher than someone in SACs, your moderated SAC mark should be higher than theirs.




i must sound stupid but i seriously dont get this...

if im ranked first, with and average of A+ in sacs, but in the exam i get a B+

and someone else in my class who averages a B+ for sacs, in the exam they get an A+

do i get their A+ mark?

mypurpleundercracka

  • Guest
Re: Rankings
« Reply #7 on: October 07, 2009, 09:46:51 pm »
0
^^^

lol me neither

ngRISING

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 688
  • Respect: +3
Re: Rankings
« Reply #8 on: October 07, 2009, 11:39:49 pm »
0
He'll get higher I think.
If something as small as 3 marks puts you from an average rank to the top, there would be no point to sacs imo.

3 marks is pretty big if it seperates you from a A & a A+
2008: Further Maths & LOTE
2009: English Language, Psychology, Maths Methods, Business Management and Physics
2010: Bachelor of Commerce @ Monash!
2011: Bachelor of Business-Logistics & Supply Chain Management (applied)

Employed by NAB.

mypurpleundercracka

  • Guest
Re: Rankings
« Reply #9 on: October 08, 2009, 12:31:23 am »
0
happened to me in legal. girl above me was dominating 100% every sac. I got 99% but regardless, she was top. Exam time came i got 49 she got 43

u must have killed that exam 60/60 lol

ngRISING

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 688
  • Respect: +3
Re: Rankings
« Reply #10 on: October 08, 2009, 09:47:02 pm »
0
happened to me in legal. girl above me was dominating 100% every sac. I got 99% but regardless, she was top. Exam time came i got 49 she got 43

noice !
2008: Further Maths & LOTE
2009: English Language, Psychology, Maths Methods, Business Management and Physics
2010: Bachelor of Commerce @ Monash!
2011: Bachelor of Business-Logistics & Supply Chain Management (applied)

Employed by NAB.

Alex Hatch

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 11
  • Respect: +1
Re: Rankings
« Reply #11 on: October 15, 2009, 07:19:36 pm »
0
I'm ranked 3rd in my school with an average of 93... is it still possible to get high 40s to 50?

mba

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 366
  • Respect: +2
Re: Rankings
« Reply #12 on: October 15, 2009, 11:04:19 pm »
0
I'm ranked 3rd in my school with an average of 93... is it still possible to get high 40s to 50?

I don't think 50. My teacher has told me though that I can still get 45 or above as long as I nail the exam. Btw, I'm second in my cohort having lost 7 marks in Unit 3 and 0 in Unit 4. I'm pretty sure you could still get above 45 if you only lose 3 - 4 marks in the exam.
Graduate '10
95.00                       www.vcecommerce.net

lacoste

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 973
  • Respect: +2
Re: Rankings
« Reply #13 on: October 15, 2009, 11:07:49 pm »
0
Don't be discouraged about SAC marks, it is your exam marks that influence your SACs.

50 is possible as long as you smash the exam!

:)


mypurpleundercracka

  • Guest
Re: Rankings
« Reply #14 on: October 15, 2009, 11:16:51 pm »
0
ive dropped four marks the entire year for sacs and im ranked first, just gona hope i can smash the exam which i feel pretty confident about, lost 1 mark on freakin trial exam for mentioning 3 management skills instead of 2 is that bs or wat?  >:(