Hi, any tips on how to smash the extended responses in the legal trial? Are you aware of any good strategies or structures which can be easily applied?
Hey! Welcome to the forums!!

Two key points to writing a 25/25 (or 15/15) Legal essay:
-
Lots of evidence, cases, laws, treaties, media, statistics, reports and others. You
must be able to prove your...
-
Strong argument, and not just a basic one like "This was good," or "This was bad," but something that's been considered carefully and shows that you've really delved into the issues you are discussing. I wrote a bit of a guide on this you can read
here 
In terms of structures, pretty much any question can be answered with one of two basic structures (of course others exist but these work for pretty much anything)
-
Case by case, where you take situations/cases and analyse the effectiveness of the law in each. I used this a lot for World Order, but it works well if you have a few
really powerful cases, with links to laws and other evidence, that you want to discuss. This could also be "issue based," for example, a paragraph on domestic violence for Family option, then one on surrogacy, etc!
-
Response by response, where you take some response to some issue and analyse it in a paragraph, then just do that for a few responses. In Crime this might take the form of analysing the criminal trial process, separately to the sentencing process, separately to the way international crime is handled, etc.
For all, be sure you are
evaluating. Pretty much every Legal question will ask you to evaluate/judge in some form, you should constantly be using words like "effectively" and "ineffectively," making sure you are critically judging
how well the law has done in responding to whatever issue or case you are discussing
