I think something maybe missing from the debate here is the perspective that the police officers might actually integrate into the school very seamlessly and not carry a position of "authority" but instead as a leader or mentor. My initial thought was the article meant having police officers in uniform with tasers on their belt walking around the school yard. Useless and authoritarian. Then I realised that they might have plain-clothed police officers who sit in on the classes and assist with facilitating exercises (like recess and lunch games, organising students in free-play, and speaking with students "at-risk" of turning to patterns of crime. The idea isn't soooo far fetched when you realise that police officers who work with children specifically, or families, do this kind of thing a lot of the time anyway - but aren't full-time "stationed" in one school (presuming it's the same in Victoria as it is in NSW).
I don't at all imagine the role of the police officer is to be a law-enforcer in the school: stopping people smoking, breaking up fights, etc. Perhaps they could assist with these things, but I can't imagine that would be their primary responsibility if the aim is to grow a relationship of respect.
Nonetheless: it's not something I support. I think rotation of plain clothes (but not concealed occupations) police officers in schools can do wonders for the relationships that students have with police outside of the school yard. I think having a full-time stationed police officer in the school isn't a judicious use of resources. Seems too concentrated to have one officer per school, for ten schools. When instead, you could have 40 schools visited regularly in rotation.
#HSCLegalstudies: Negative perspectives of, and interactions with, police officers held by youth is a considerable contributor to crime in youth but also in early adulthood - sometimes leading into adulthood.