For question 4)c. wouldn't a vaccine not be possible for pollen fragments? Because pollen fragments are allergens rather than pathogens, it is unlikely an immune response will be initiated against them in a normal individual as they will are ordinarily harmless molecules. Therefore, it no memory B cells or specific antibodies would be produced so long-term immunity could not be achieved?
Allergens (such as pollen fragments) are just antigens. Ideally, people wouldn't mount an immune response to them as they would recognise them as benign antigens and thus an adaptive immune response would not be activated and IgE antibodies wouldn't be produced. However, this is not always the case, as the allergen antigens do illicit an adaptive immune response hence by IgE antibodies are produced and hence why people have allergic reactions to pollen and other allergens. As such, a vaccine can be made to allergens which operate as explained in the sample solution.
hi for question 6c it gave us the mRNA sequence so i wrote out all the complementary bases for that mRNA sequence and then found the corresponding amino acid for each codon. were we supposed to do that or were we supposed to find the amino acids using the codons in the mRNA sequence given to us?
Codons are the 3 base groups on the mRNA. By writing out the complimentary 3 base codes, you are finding the anticodons. The chart gave which codons correspond to each amino acid, thus you should be using the mRNA sequence
would a systematic error be incorrect calibration of temp of test tubes and water bath therby affecting the whole lot of results
Yes!
For the limitation questions, would the absence of a control group be a limitation?
(q11)
I don't think there is much use for a control group (such as one at room temperature) so I don't think that would improve the experimental design - I could be wrong though.
hi for the mc question about the bacteria that were modified to produce human insulin i chose GMO bc in the question it didnt specifially state that the bacteria had a gene from the human inserted into, it just stated that it was modified to produce human insulin so wouldnt GMO be more correct??
I think you are supposed to infer that the bacteria must have contained a human gene in order to produce human insulin