Do you know what, ninwa, I'm absolutely sick of receiving your 'I think VCAA is the greatest' lecture every time I open my mouth to express my disappointments about VCAA and my ENTER etc. So everytime you just assume that 'I don't have any arguments to refute your logical ones' I am beginning to get very pissed off.
Once again with the no-substance over-emotional hysterical responses. I know you are a mature person who is capable of reasoned, adult discussion. Can you use that capability please?
If I recall correctly, this is the first and only time where I have defended VCAA's system against your complaints. I could be wrong - so show me where else I've done it.
However, I was talking about a CHANGE in the present system, whereby English is no longer meant to be in the top 4.
In which case you would have "deserved" a better score than TT because you "did better".
... which was the whole premise of my conclusion. Did you even bother to read it? But either way, thanks for
confirming that you think the system is wrong because you didn't get a higher ENTER score than someone who you felt didn't perform as well as you did overall.
i.e. they may complain but may want to do a job and earn their own money.
... which suggests that they are "living with it", no? Which is one of the two "strategies" I proposed, no?
Where in that statement did I imply that one shouldn't complain?
I work full time at the moment with 3.5 hours of travel time, which means I leave home at 7.30am and get home by around 8pm. Every day except Thursdays, where I have my other job after this full-time job, which means I don't get home until 10-10.30pm. Life sucks!!!
^ there's my whinge.
However, I will suck it up and continue to be a contributing member of society.
^ there's me living with it. Et voila, option 2 for me!