Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

October 10, 2025, 01:15:55 am

Author Topic: Implication of heat content  (Read 491 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

kenhung123

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3373
  • Respect: +7
Implication of heat content
« on: June 23, 2010, 12:37:24 am »
0
So when the change in heat content of reactants and products is negative/positive, could we say there is a net loss (negative) or net gain (positive) of energy in the chemical reaction? (assuming the enclosed system is not part of the chemical reaction?)

Mao

  • CH41RMN
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 9181
  • Respect: +390
  • School: Kambrya College
  • School Grad Year: 2008
Re: Implication of heat content
« Reply #1 on: June 23, 2010, 01:45:07 am »
0
You mean if the change in enthalpy of the system (reactants and products) is negative, the surroundings must have gained energy, and vice versa.
Editor for ATARNotes Chemistry study guides.

VCE 2008 | Monash BSc (Chem., Appl. Math.) 2009-2011 | UoM BScHon (Chem.) 2012 | UoM PhD (Chem.) 2013-2015

kenhung123

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3373
  • Respect: +7
Re: Implication of heat content
« Reply #2 on: June 23, 2010, 07:26:15 am »
0
Umm yea, but alternatively could you say the chemical reaction results in a net production of heat in an exothermic?

Martoman

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1476
  • Respect: +11
Re: Implication of heat content
« Reply #3 on: June 23, 2010, 04:38:13 pm »
0
if its negative think of the thing as losing heat, and if it loses heat then it must give it off in some way. This is always exothermic.

Obviously the converse holds. If there is a net gain of heat then the product has gained heat. This must mean it absorbed it from somewhere, usually in the solvent it is reacting in (think of the ice packs the afl use to treat injuries the "snap" ones, they are endothermic as they absorb heat).
2009: Math methods: 50, Psychology: 44
2010: chem 47, further 48, Spesh 49 fml seriously and other yr 11 subs.
2011: Holidaying, screw school.
No. Not azn.
___________________________________
Swedish meal time all the time