Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

November 01, 2025, 12:20:24 pm

Author Topic: more questions  (Read 23809 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Glockmeister

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1660
  • RIP Sweet Nothings.
  • Respect: +8
Re: more questions
« Reply #75 on: June 09, 2008, 10:18:32 pm »
0
Ah ok, thanks Mao
"this post is more confusing than actual chemistry.... =S" - Mao

[22:07] <robbo> i luv u Glockmeister

<Glockmeister> like the people who like do well academically
<Glockmeister> tend to deny they actually do well
<%Neobeo> sounds like Ahmad0
<@Ahmad0> no
<@Ahmad0> sounds like Neobeo

2007: Mathematical Methods 37; Psychology 38
2008: English 33; Specialist Maths 32 ; Chemistry 38; IT: Applications 42
2009: Bachelor of Behavioural Neuroscience, Monash University.

shinny

  • VN MVP 2010
  • Honorary Moderator
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 4327
  • Respect: +256
  • School: Melbourne High School
  • School Grad Year: 2008
Re: more questions
« Reply #76 on: June 09, 2008, 10:29:14 pm »
0
basically if theres an excess of Cl, the reaction of C-H bonds breaking and C-Cl bonds forming will just keep going up to tetrachloro. wording for the question isnt too great since they dont mention excess, but i would assume D as well given what u have
MBBS (hons) - Monash University

YR11 '07: Biology 49
YR12 '08: Chemistry 47; Spesh 41; Methods 49; Business Management 50; English 43

ENTER: 99.70


bec

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 689
  • Respect: +1
Re: more questions
« Reply #77 on: June 10, 2008, 08:44:54 am »
0
If you had to label functional groups, would you call C=C an alkene functional group?

Also, when you draw a polypeptide, should the ends of the amino acids be NH2 and COOH, or NH3+ and COO-? or does it depend on whether the question states that it's in zwitterion form? or...is zwitterion form sort of "negated" when they form dipeptide bonds?

Mao

  • CH41RMN
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 9181
  • Respect: +390
  • School: Kambrya College
  • School Grad Year: 2008
Re: more questions
« Reply #78 on: June 10, 2008, 09:20:56 am »
0
If you had to label functional groups, would you call C=C an alkene functional group?

VCAA did it in the sample exam, and since we live in VCE land for everything that happens, yes, VCAA accepts it [as for if it is an actual functional group, that is not part of the VCE course :P]

Also, when you draw a polypeptide, should the ends of the amino acids be NH2 and COOH, or NH3+ and COO-? or does it depend on whether the question states that it's in zwitterion form? or...is zwitterion form sort of "negated" when they form dipeptide bonds?
i've only ever seen it draw with NH2 and COOH. unless the question states the polypeptide is in zwitterion form, i'd take the safer option.

though my personal opinion on this [probably wrong] is that polypeptides dont often go into zwitterion form. Zwitterion is when the COOH donates the H to the NH2 [remembering that both are weak acid/bases]. In an 2-amino acid, the distance between them is short, so the proton can move with a degree of ease. In a polypeptide, however, the chain is very long, and it'll be very difficult for the proton to travel that far. Since the weakness of both functional groups, a portion will ionise with water, but the majority will stay in the neutral form [not zwitterion]
[just my take, could be completely wrong]
Editor for ATARNotes Chemistry study guides.

VCE 2008 | Monash BSc (Chem., Appl. Math.) 2009-2011 | UoM BScHon (Chem.) 2012 | UoM PhD (Chem.) 2013-2015

bec

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 689
  • Respect: +1
Re: more questions
« Reply #79 on: June 10, 2008, 06:58:25 pm »
0
how would we show the equation for hydrolysis of glycogen into glucose?

would that just be (C6H10O5)n + nH2O --> nC6H12O6?


chem-nerd

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 368
  • Respect: +13
Re: more questions
« Reply #80 on: June 10, 2008, 07:00:07 pm »
0
how would we show the equation for hydrolysis of glycogen into glucose?

would that just be (C6H10O5)n + nH2O --> nC6H12O6?



n-1(H20)

bec

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 689
  • Respect: +1
Re: more questions
« Reply #81 on: June 10, 2008, 07:07:14 pm »
0
ah yep you're right
so otherwise is that ok?

bec

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 689
  • Respect: +1
Re: more questions
« Reply #82 on: June 10, 2008, 08:43:33 pm »
0
also, just found something in my textbook that i don't understand...mass spec:
The relative intensities of the ions depend on:
- the energy of the bombarding electrons how would we know how energetic the electrons are?
- the stability of the ion fragments formed what constitutes a stable fragment?
- the ease with which ions can lose atoms how can we know this

Or, do you think we'd just not need to know any of it...is it enough to just know that fragments have different intensities, for a variety of reasons, and the height of the peak corresponds to its intensity/relative concentration?

Mao

  • CH41RMN
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 9181
  • Respect: +390
  • School: Kambrya College
  • School Grad Year: 2008
Re: more questions
« Reply #83 on: June 10, 2008, 08:46:12 pm »
0
also, just found something in my textbook that i don't understand...mass spec:
The relative intensities of the ions depend on:
- the energy of the bombarding electrons how would we know how energetic the electrons are?
- the stability of the ion fragments formed what constitutes a stable fragment?
- the ease with which ions can lose atoms how can we know this

Or, do you think we'd just not need to know any of it...is it enough to just know that fragments have different intensities, for a variety of reasons, and the height of the peak corresponds to its intensity/relative concentration?
we dont mean to know these, but just remember that some things are easier broken than others

like, O-H is broken easier than O-O, C-C is fairly easy to break, C=O almost never happens, etc~
Editor for ATARNotes Chemistry study guides.

VCE 2008 | Monash BSc (Chem., Appl. Math.) 2009-2011 | UoM BScHon (Chem.) 2012 | UoM PhD (Chem.) 2013-2015

bec

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 689
  • Respect: +1
Re: more questions
« Reply #84 on: June 10, 2008, 08:57:23 pm »
0
alright sounds good

what about the synchrotron...i'm assuming we don't need to know about that?

Mao

  • CH41RMN
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 9181
  • Respect: +390
  • School: Kambrya College
  • School Grad Year: 2008
Re: more questions
« Reply #85 on: June 10, 2008, 09:01:25 pm »
0
alright sounds good

what about the synchrotron...i'm assuming we don't need to know about that?
absolutely not

that's physics unit 4 detailed study xD
Editor for ATARNotes Chemistry study guides.

VCE 2008 | Monash BSc (Chem., Appl. Math.) 2009-2011 | UoM BScHon (Chem.) 2012 | UoM PhD (Chem.) 2013-2015

bec

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 689
  • Respect: +1
Re: more questions
« Reply #86 on: June 10, 2008, 09:19:06 pm »
0
last question:

The ammonia content of one window cleaner is given as 4.0% NH3 (m/V)
A 750mL of this cleaner would contain approximately
A. 1.8 mol of N atoms
B. 30mL of NH3
(+ some other options)

i thought both of these were correct?
the answer is A, but couldn't you assume that the density of NH3 is ~1g/mL, so since there's 30g NH3 in 750mL of the solution, that'd be approx 30mL NH3?

Mao

  • CH41RMN
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 9181
  • Respect: +390
  • School: Kambrya College
  • School Grad Year: 2008
Re: more questions
« Reply #87 on: June 10, 2008, 09:38:03 pm »
0
yes, that *could* be assumed, but some NH3 will also ionise to form NH4+, so its not exact.

A however, is correct.
Editor for ATARNotes Chemistry study guides.

VCE 2008 | Monash BSc (Chem., Appl. Math.) 2009-2011 | UoM BScHon (Chem.) 2012 | UoM PhD (Chem.) 2013-2015

bec

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 689
  • Respect: +1
Re: more questions
« Reply #88 on: June 11, 2008, 11:23:43 am »
0
in carboxylic acids, do you always start counting the carbons (for naming purposes) from the end with the carboxyl group, regardless of where functional groups are attached?

also, i have a few qs from exam 3 in the neap book

Q7 multiple choice
have no idea what this is...

4c
...how would you know that Cr2+ is going to be oxidised to Cr3+ when added to MnO4- ...in hindsight it seems obvious, but originally i assumed it would just form an Cr(MnO4)2. if the question doesn't specifically state it's going to be redox, is there any way of knowing that it is - except using intuition and the fact that the permanganate ion is a strong oxidant?

thanks
« Last Edit: June 11, 2008, 11:27:53 am by bec »

shinny

  • VN MVP 2010
  • Honorary Moderator
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 4327
  • Respect: +256
  • School: Melbourne High School
  • School Grad Year: 2008
Re: more questions
« Reply #89 on: June 11, 2008, 11:40:14 am »
0
7. just identify each linkage and put a line to cut where the bond forms. in this, its obviously an ester link, so cut a line between each OO and ull begin to obviously see that the square is a diol and the triangle is a...di...carboxylic acid thingy...forgot what their actual name is =P

4c. u wouldnt actually need to state it gets oxidised to Cr3+, but ull have to say that it may react with the MnO4- whereas it wouldnt have any effect in colorimetry/UV vis because it doesnt react with the ferrozine. the word 'suggest' in the question kind of implies that ull have to make a few assumptions here (such as that it doesnt react with ferrozine)
MBBS (hons) - Monash University

YR11 '07: Biology 49
YR12 '08: Chemistry 47; Spesh 41; Methods 49; Business Management 50; English 43

ENTER: 99.70