« Reply #193 on: April 13, 2011, 05:44:12 pm »
0
Yes but he was enquiring whether it would or wouldn't, surely if it would produce a SEAS grant, he would plan to utilise it.
If it would produce and SEAS grant and he isn't planning on utilising it, surely that is trolling?
It's all hypothetical. A SEAS would never be granted because of the loss of a pet, you know that. Therefore, everything you have said so far has been erroneous and unnecessary.
If you just admitted that a SEAS would never be granted because of the loss of a pet, why on earth would he bother to ask that? What's hypothetical about it?
I stated that a SEAS would never be granted because of the loss of a pet... not kazdawg, the person who posted the question? I don't see why my knowledge of SEAS and kazdawg's question have to do with one another, we aren't the same person...

Logged
2011 - English, English Language, Philosophy, Indonesian SL, Outdoor and Environmental Studies.
“We are all alone, born alone, die alone, we shall all someday look back on our lives and see that, in spite of our company, we were alone the whole way. I do not say lonely -- at least, not all the time -- but essentially, and finally, alone. This is what makes your self-respect so important, and I don't see how you can respect yourself if you must look in the hearts and minds of others for your happiness.”
― Hunter S. Thompson