I agree that the majority of students will fit that stereotype ganges, but for many students, particularly the ones who have excelled in previous years, I think their should be broader options for them to study ahead instead of get straight A+'s through Year 9 and 10.
In saying that, I think my school was pretty good with me though. I did Year 7 and 8 maths in Year 7 and Year 9 maths in year 8 onwards (goes to show that early mathematical ability doesnt always equal VCE Methods success).
What I don't understand is that my school only offers an advanced program like that for Maths, why not English? or Commerce subjects?
Why was I able to complete Methods 3/4 in Year 11 with C's in 1/2 when I was getting A+'s for all my other subjects? Why was I not given the opportunity to do say Legal 3/4 and Business 3/4?
This is just an example... and if I fail, then who is to blame? Myself of course. Its my VCE and I think that schools that become too worried about the perception of 'their schools' performance make the VCE more about the school rather than the student, and thats just wrong.
This coming from the student who taught his Year 10 commerce class on the board because the teacher didn't understand most of the course (she was subsequently fired at the end of the year)