can the d loop in the mtdna only be used to identify recent common ancestors because it mutates so much?
Ye, I think that cause it mutates at such accelerated rate (although some areas of mitochondria have a lower muatation rate) it's easier to tell the differences between two closely related genomes. Something like that

EDIT: two more quick questions

1. What's the correct theory now; is it the out-of-africa one or the multiregional hypothesis?
2. QUESTION 17
Today’s wide range of kangaroos evolved from shorter nosed ancestors from thousands of
years ago. The shorter nosed ancestors lived in Australia when the continent was once
covered by forests, from the east to west coast. As the climate became drier, however,
grasslands replaced much of the forest. In response, all of the short-nosed browsing species
of kangaroo independently evolved the longer grazing snouts that we recognise today.
The independent evolution of longer grazing snouts from shorter browsing
snouts in Australian kangaroos is an example of:
A Convergent evolution.
B Parallel evolution.
C Allopatric speciation.
D Divergent evolution.
Why's the answer B? What is parallel evolution?