Thanks
I'll respond to both points.
1) If I do start this bridging course, it will be VERY soon, within the next week or so I would presume. I need to call up/e-mail and get some more information about the structure of the course and other stuff. From what I can tell, the course seems to be a lot less intense then the methods course, but maybe thats just me seeing 4 modules and thinking thats easier.
* Module 1: Introduction to Functions;
* Module 2: Coordinate Geometry and Trigonometry;
* Module 3: Calculus and its Applications; and
* Module 4: Financial Mathematics and Statistics.
By no means do I think this would be easy. God no! I want to know what this is going to be like in terms of difficulty before I embark on it. If the workload and the difficulty of the course is going to be better than methods than I will probabbly do it. If it's going to be like redoing methods again but in 3 months then thats just stupid because I know that won't happen. The thing with this, from what I can tell, is that I need 75% on the 2 exams (or the average of those to be 75?... I'll find out). This to me indicates that it might not be as hard as the methods course because it seems stupid that they would expect 75% on this exam to be equal to 75% on the methods exam, unless they just delibretly want a higher standard of requirements from this bridging course. I dont think I'd get into Melb Uni anyway, so I have to check with Monash Uni if they accept this bridging course or if they have similar bridging courses.
2) Can sum this up. I'm not applyin for RMIT, Deakin , La Trobe or ACU because if I dont get into commerce I will do Bachelor of Business at Monash Caulfield which is basically commerce but at Caulfield campus. Unless I completly screw up im sure ill get 82 ish